Anonymous wrote:OR we could better train the resource officers so they are friendly, authoritative figures rather than scary, remote figures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are SROs now and have been for years. If they are the answer to controlling/addressing violence, why is it going up? Seems to me the money could be better spent on other types of interventions that address root causes of violence, like mental health support.
Couldn't you also use this same criticism for any mitigation measure that doesn't completely eliminate the harm? Like vaccines, seat belts, smoking cessation, sun block, etc?
Anonymous wrote:There are SROs now and have been for years. If they are the answer to controlling/addressing violence, why is it going up? Seems to me the money could be better spent on other types of interventions that address root causes of violence, like mental health support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm astonished by the Council's decision to pull SROs. Just does not make sense. There are potential safety issues any place with large groups of people. What are teachers and admin supposed to do when there's a massive fight or one kid pulls a knife on another? Wouldn't it be better to have an onsite SRO who knows the school and kids versus calling MPD to arrive 20 minutes later?
I get the concerns about police in schools. But lots of intermediate action that could have been taken -- better, trauma-informed training, SROs don't wear police uniforms or carry their weapons, etc.
Good thing is that this will not take effect until 2025 so we have three more budget cycles to reverse it.
I'm writing to my council person. Common sense is not being used.
Thank you. Please include getting rid of Grosso’s zero suspension bill too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm astonished by the Council's decision to pull SROs. Just does not make sense. There are potential safety issues any place with large groups of people. What are teachers and admin supposed to do when there's a massive fight or one kid pulls a knife on another? Wouldn't it be better to have an onsite SRO who knows the school and kids versus calling MPD to arrive 20 minutes later?
I get the concerns about police in schools. But lots of intermediate action that could have been taken -- better, trauma-informed training, SROs don't wear police uniforms or carry their weapons, etc.
Good thing is that this will not take effect until 2025 so we have three more budget cycles to reverse it.
I'm writing to my council person. Common sense is not being used.
Anonymous wrote:I'm astonished by the Council's decision to pull SROs. Just does not make sense. There are potential safety issues any place with large groups of people. What are teachers and admin supposed to do when there's a massive fight or one kid pulls a knife on another? Wouldn't it be better to have an onsite SRO who knows the school and kids versus calling MPD to arrive 20 minutes later?
I get the concerns about police in schools. But lots of intermediate action that could have been taken -- better, trauma-informed training, SROs don't wear police uniforms or carry their weapons, etc.
Good thing is that this will not take effect until 2025 so we have three more budget cycles to reverse it.
Anonymous wrote:Resource officers came from a nationwide push by police unions to find a place to stuff member officers who were unfit for street duty. They're not a good thing to have in schools.
Anonymous wrote:Resource officers came from a nationwide push by police unions to find a place to stuff member officers who were unfit for street duty. They're not a good thing to have in schools.