Anonymous wrote:If realtors have good market data, they will have a reasonable sense of where the property should max out and will target that number for the top of the escalation to give their client the best shot at winning without having them wildly overpay. If everyone is valuing the property roughly the same way, the escalation clauses are probably somewhat similar and therefore the winning bid will max out their escalation.
When I see properties like the CP that just went for $400k over at a point where most people agree that it is beyond what it realistically should be worth. I wonder whether there's some manipulation going on.
The first time, the realtor showed us what they said was the competing offer and it was literally a standard form with rather messy hand-written entries.
Anonymous wrote:Exactly. Feels statistically unlikely that each time the next highest bidder was just below our max. Not impossible, but seems unlikely.
Curious to hear from anyone whose escalation clause DID NOT max out in order to win the bid. Are there a lot of you out there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just out of curiosity, has anyone ever won a bid with an escalation clause that did NOT go to the max? For both houses I have purchased (one in 2008 and one this year) both escalation clauses were fully maxed to win. It just seems remarkable that in each case there was one other bidder who just happened to be right under our max that triggered ours to go all the way. The first time, the realtor showed us what they said was the competing offer and it was literally a standard form with rather messy hand-written entries. It just left me feeling a little uneasy like there was some kind of collusion with the agents to max out the sale price. Wouldn't you know it, again this year, our escalation clause gets maxed out.
When I see properties like the CP that just went for $400k over at a point where most people agree that it is beyond what it realistically should be worth. I wonder whether there's some manipulation going on. I know I'm offending every agent on this board, but sorry, even buyer's agents have a conflict of interest in the real estate compensation system we have.
One side will max before the other does. That's a certainty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just out of curiosity, has anyone ever won a bid with an escalation clause that did NOT go to the max? For both houses I have purchased (one in 2008 and one this year) both escalation clauses were fully maxed to win. It just seems remarkable that in each case there was one other bidder who just happened to be right under our max that triggered ours to go all the way. The first time, the realtor showed us what they said was the competing offer and it was literally a standard form with rather messy hand-written entries. It just left me feeling a little uneasy like there was some kind of collusion with the agents to max out the sale price. Wouldn't you know it, again this year, our escalation clause gets maxed out.
When I see properties like the CP that just went for $400k over at a point where most people agree that it is beyond what it realistically should be worth. I wonder whether there's some manipulation going on. I know I'm offending every agent on this board, but sorry, even buyer's agents have a conflict of interest in the real estate compensation system we have.
One side will max before the other does. That's a certainty.
Anonymous wrote:Just out of curiosity, has anyone ever won a bid with an escalation clause that did NOT go to the max? For both houses I have purchased (one in 2008 and one this year) both escalation clauses were fully maxed to win. It just seems remarkable that in each case there was one other bidder who just happened to be right under our max that triggered ours to go all the way. The first time, the realtor showed us what they said was the competing offer and it was literally a standard form with rather messy hand-written entries. It just left me feeling a little uneasy like there was some kind of collusion with the agents to max out the sale price. Wouldn't you know it, again this year, our escalation clause gets maxed out.
When I see properties like the CP that just went for $400k over at a point where most people agree that it is beyond what it realistically should be worth. I wonder whether there's some manipulation going on. I know I'm offending every agent on this board, but sorry, even buyer's agents have a conflict of interest in the real estate compensation system we have.