Anonymous wrote:This guy is buying admission for a couple generations of his progeny. The school definitely does NOT need the money. But his great grandkids will all get to be Cardinals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Amen -- from a Stanford grad, spouse of grad, and parent of grad -- and that's exactly why I don't give any $ to Stanford
You know you can earmark your donations to go only to scholarships, right? Not that you need to do that at Stanford (but why not?)...
For example - we direct all donations to our graduate school go directly to the department we studied in. The school funded all of our graduate tuition and provided paid jobs.
Earmarking the money to them means the university is required to add it to the department budget. This allows the department to funnel it to programs that support current graduate students.
We also choose specific places for our undergrad donations to be directed. Never to the university as a whole.
We know the $ gets where we intended it to because those departments write us separately to thank us.
Yes, you can earmark, or you can simply choose to give to other organizations that have a greater need and do greater good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Amen -- from a Stanford grad, spouse of grad, and parent of grad -- and that's exactly why I don't give any $ to Stanford
You know you can earmark your donations to go only to scholarships, right? Not that you need to do that at Stanford (but why not?)...
For example - we direct all donations to our graduate school go directly to the department we studied in. The school funded all of our graduate tuition and provided paid jobs.
Earmarking the money to them means the university is required to add it to the department budget. This allows the department to funnel it to programs that support current graduate students.
We also choose specific places for our undergrad donations to be directed. Never to the university as a whole.
We know the $ gets where we intended it to because those departments write us separately to thank us.
Yes, you can earmark, or you can simply choose to give to other organizations that have a greater need and do greater good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Amen -- from a Stanford grad, spouse of grad, and parent of grad -- and that's exactly why I don't give any $ to Stanford
You know you can earmark your donations to go only to scholarships, right? Not that you need to do that at Stanford (but why not?)...
For example - we direct all donations to our graduate school go directly to the department we studied in. The school funded all of our graduate tuition and provided paid jobs.
Earmarking the money to them means the university is required to add it to the department budget. This allows the department to funnel it to programs that support current graduate students.
We also choose specific places for our undergrad donations to be directed. Never to the university as a whole.
We know the $ gets where we intended it to because those departments write us separately to thank us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
I hate comments like this and here is why: There are tons of posts on other boards (like the money one) asking how much people donate, how much rich people donate, etc. The answers are meaningless because there are still judgments coming: not enough, not to the right cause, etc. People give what they give, to where they want. I am guessing no matter where someone donates to, there are "more deserving charities" in others' minds.
Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Amen -- from a Stanford grad, spouse of grad, and parent of grad -- and that's exactly why I don't give any $ to Stanford
Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?
Anonymous wrote:Agree, PP. And to a school that really doesn't need it. How about taking a billion dollars and starting scholarships for poor, but capable students to get college degrees?