Anonymous
04/25/2022 19:05
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
It's possible that the admissions process may be different by then. No way of knowing what will happen for Class of 2027 with a new superintendent coming in. Wouldn't be surprised at all if the admissions office and the school get together with a year of data on the new group and see what, if any, additional inputs to the system would make sense.
SCOTUS may not even grant certiorari to this case when it comes around.
Agreed, the new superintendent should change the admissions process before the Supreme Court gets a chance to rule on it.
Tying your legacy to Brabrand’s mess is not a smart move.
No matter what the new super does some people won't be happy.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 19:05
Subject: Re:Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Supreme Court supporting Racist policies is not the first time.
How is ensuring a level playing field racist?
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:56
Subject: Re:Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:This also means another year of already crowded high schools like Chantilly, McLean, and Oakton having larger freshmen classes, as their feeder middle schools send fewer kids to TJ, and FCPS twiddling their thumbs about it.
It would be great if the left hand of FCPS ever figured out what the right hand was doing.
huh? you're worried about overcrowding because of TJ?
make it make sense
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:38
Subject: Re:Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
This also means another year of already crowded high schools like Chantilly, McLean, and Oakton having larger freshmen classes, as their feeder middle schools send fewer kids to TJ, and FCPS twiddling their thumbs about it.
It would be great if the left hand of FCPS ever figured out what the right hand was doing.
It would be great if the left hand of FCPS ever figured out what the right hand was doing.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:35
Subject: Re:Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Supreme Court supporting Racist policies is not the first time.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:34
Subject: Re:Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Does it mean results will be out on Friday?
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:26
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
It's possible that the admissions process may be different by then. No way of knowing what will happen for Class of 2027 with a new superintendent coming in. Wouldn't be surprised at all if the admissions office and the school get together with a year of data on the new group and see what, if any, additional inputs to the system would make sense.
SCOTUS may not even grant certiorari to this case when it comes around.
Agreed, the new superintendent should change the admissions process before the Supreme Court gets a chance to rule on it.
Tying your legacy to Brabrand’s mess is not a smart move.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:09
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
It's possible that the admissions process may be different by then. No way of knowing what will happen for Class of 2027 with a new superintendent coming in. Wouldn't be surprised at all if the admissions office and the school get together with a year of data on the new group and see what, if any, additional inputs to the system would make sense.
SCOTUS may not even grant certiorari to this case when it comes around.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:03
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
+1
Won’t stop her from spewing vile on FoxNews though.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 18:02
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
well if it was a flagrant constitutional violation they wouldn't have allowed the class to be seated now would they? I'd say this decision is pretty indicative of the likely outcome on the merits.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 17:55
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
Won’t be a different vote.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 17:55
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
Anonymous wrote:eat it, Asra
Don't get too excited. This is only about the stay. We'll see what happens on the merits.
Anonymous
04/25/2022 17:50
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
eat it, Asra
Anonymous
04/25/2022 17:49
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
LOLOLOL
Anonymous
04/25/2022 17:32
Subject: Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court
https://twitter.com/scotusblog/status/1518700265700007937?s=10&t=aLrACiGPPPdf0U2e9N3jkA
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have voted to grant the request.
Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh join the liberals.
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have voted to grant the request.
Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh join the liberals.