Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't and won't get over the fact that he didn't want the schools to open in person. Between that and his soft on crime approach makes him a hard pass for me. I am no Bowser fan and was hoping for another candidate I could support but I'll be voting for her.

Same here. Robert White's policy proposals are just a bunch of buzzwords. He is trying to win over the activists who want to defund MPD, and the people who want teachers unions to completely run the schools. No thanks.

Some WTU leadership doesn't even like him:
https://twitter.com/DCWard7teacher/status/1430587301890076672

https://twitter.com/DCWard7teacher/status/1430587698830577665

Despite that, WTU endorsed him: https://www.wtuteacher.net/cope

This "WTU Leader" is completely unhinged. I've read her tweets over the years, and I wonder how she gets any teaching done.

Bowser is the "moderate" / pro-police candidate in this race. Do with that what you will.

I'm no Bowser fan, but I will not vote for someone who wants less police and more unproven violence interrupters. He seems to be pandering to the abolish MPD crowd which is scary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't and won't get over the fact that he didn't want the schools to open in person. Between that and his soft on crime approach makes him a hard pass for me. I am no Bowser fan and was hoping for another candidate I could support but I'll be voting for her.

Same here. Robert White's policy proposals are just a bunch of buzzwords. He is trying to win over the activists who want to defund MPD, and the people who want teachers unions to completely run the schools. No thanks.

Some WTU leadership doesn't even like him:
https://twitter.com/DCWard7teacher/status/1430587301890076672

https://twitter.com/DCWard7teacher/status/1430587698830577665

Despite that, WTU endorsed him: https://www.wtuteacher.net/cope

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't and won't get over the fact that he didn't want the schools to open in person. Between that and his soft on crime approach makes him a hard pass for me. I am no Bowser fan and was hoping for another candidate I could support but I'll be voting for her.

Same here. Robert White's policy proposals are just a bunch of buzzwords. He is trying to win over the activists who want to defund MPD, and the people who want teachers unions to completely run the schools. No thanks.

You don't have to worry, barring some sort of race-altering news, Bowser is going to win and it's not going to be particularly close.

Anonymous wrote:I can't and won't get over the fact that he didn't want the schools to open in person. Between that and his soft on crime approach makes him a hard pass for me. I am no Bowser fan and was hoping for another candidate I could support but I'll be voting for her.

Same here. Robert White's policy proposals are just a bunch of buzzwords. He is trying to win over the activists who want to defund MPD, and the people who want teachers unions to completely run the schools. No thanks.

Eight years of dealing with the Bowser administration is enough for me. Everything is quid-pro-quo with them, you didn't help me so I'm not helping you. It's like Trumpism on a smaller scale.

I can't and won't get over the fact that he didn't want the schools to open in person. Between that and his soft on crime approach makes him a hard pass for me. I am no Bowser fan and was hoping for another candidate I could support but I'll be voting for her.

Anonymous wrote:He seems genuine. I might be wrong but Bowser is a complete sham.

He is the opposite of genuine. He just seems like a sheister with no plans but lots of pandering language.

Bowser isn't great but will easily win, simply because Robert White isn't a strong candidate and Trayon White will take votes from him even though he's a confirmed, unrepentant anti-semite bigot.

It's the golden age of thoroughly uninspiring DC city politicians.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He seems genuine. I might be wrong but Bowser is a complete sham.

This. I don't agree with him on everything (he's probably too soft on crime, for instance) but I don't think he's going to end up corrupted or in the pocket of the developers, which is really saying something around here.

What’s the alternative to helping developers? More projects? Let the city slide back into the good old days of the 80’s and 90’s with tons of crime and subsidized public housing? You do know the city only flourished because of all the construction and people like pro developer fenty?

Anonymous wrote:He seems genuine. I might be wrong but Bowser is a complete sham.

This. I don't agree with him on everything (he's probably too soft on crime, for instance) but I don't think he's going to end up corrupted or in the pocket of the developers, which is really saying something around here.

He seems genuine. I might be wrong but Bowser is a complete sham.

8 years is enough. She doesn't have a vision for the next 4 years.

Just curious, who is his base?