Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The promise made by Russia was broken.
The promise made by US was also broken.
Can you link to the promise that the US made Ukraine during this period?
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%203007/Part/volume-3007-I-52241.pdf
Russia maintains that the current Ukrainian admin is not legitimate and therefore Russia does not have to hold up its prior agreements.
Anonymous wrote:This is appalling that everyone doesn’t know this. The Ukrainians have pointed this out many times and feel very betrayed. It also will make it basically impossible to get any country to give up their nukes in the future, or to get countries to abandon efforts to get nukes. The narrative that we can’t help Ukraine because two nuclear powers can’t be at war is not helping—it just says to every non nuclear country out there that they better hurry up and get nukes or they are potentially on the menu for some dictator that does have them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The promise made by Russia was broken.
The promise made by US was also broken.
Can you link to the promise that the US made Ukraine during this period?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Seems Ukraine has nuclear weapons in 1992-1994. They had about 1200 nuclear warheads left by the Soviet Union. They had full operational control of all of them.
Then In 1994, USA ( Clinton ) and Russia have security assurances to Ukraine to give up their Nukes. They were promised security in exchange for returning the nuclear weapons to Russia and USA also promised military assurance for support.
https://www.nti.org/countries/ukraine/
I guess moral of the story is keep your Nukes! If they still had them, Russia would not be invading a nuclear country. And promises made by USA and Russia are useless 30 years later.
Hopefully, few people reading this will be encountering this fact for the first time. This is just basic knowledge of recent history.
Anonymous wrote:
Seems Ukraine has nuclear weapons in 1992-1994. They had about 1200 nuclear warheads left by the Soviet Union. They had full operational control of all of them.
Then In 1994, USA ( Clinton ) and Russia have security assurances to Ukraine to give up their Nukes. They were promised security in exchange for returning the nuclear weapons to Russia and USA also promised military assurance for support.
https://www.nti.org/countries/ukraine/
I guess moral of the story is keep your Nukes! If they still had them, Russia would not be invading a nuclear country. And promises made by USA and Russia are useless 30 years later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The promise made by Russia was broken.
The promise made by US was also broken.
Anonymous wrote:It was never an option for Ukraine to keep them.
Anonymous wrote:
The promise made by Russia was broken.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, not full operational control but still had control of al other warheads and ICBM’s.