Anonymous wrote:My first two are 2.5 years apart, and I think it’s really good for them in terms of their ability to relate, play together, be close, and understand each other. However, it was very overwhelming to me - I found having them that close together very stressful and unenjoyable in a number of ways.
I am now pregnant with my third (older two will be 8 and 5 when baby comes), and I’m excited to be able to have two more independent children when the baby comes. I don’t know what their relationships will look like, though. In my experience, it’s a mixed bag - older kids either adore or can’t stand the baby - haven’t heard too much about there being a middle of a road response.
Anonymous wrote:5 years. Enjoy (or survive) babyhood with one, and have the older one capable of self entertaining, full time school, and having playdates before introducing the crazy of a second.
Research shows minimum 2 years between siblings is best for academic success.
Anonymous wrote:2 years or slightly less.
I have four kids.
Age gap between the first two: 21 months
Age gap between #2 and #3: 2.5 years
Age gap between #3 and #4: 23 months
I felt like 2.5 years was too much
Anonymous wrote:5 years. Enjoy (or survive) babyhood with one, and have the older one capable of self entertaining, full time school, and having playdates before introducing the crazy of a second.
Research shows minimum 2 years between siblings is best for academic success.
Anonymous wrote:Mine are 21 months apart and it’s very hard for me. But it was a much easier transition for DC1 than friends who have larger age gaps. It’s like she’s too young to be too jealous. She LOVES her younger sibling. Not sure if it’s wholly attributable to the age gap but I think it helped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:5 years. Enjoy (or survive) babyhood with one, and have the older one capable of self entertaining, full time school, and having playdates before introducing the crazy of a second.
Research shows minimum 2 years between siblings is best for academic success.
Interesting. Do they have any ideas why that might be. I wouldn’t use this factoid to decide child spacing, but I would be interested to learn more
Anonymous wrote:5 years. Enjoy (or survive) babyhood with one, and have the older one capable of self entertaining, full time school, and having playdates before introducing the crazy of a second.
Research shows minimum 2 years between siblings is best for academic success.