Anonymous wrote:We live in a starter home with a decent sized yard. We could easily fit an ADU and we could pay for it by borrowing against the appreciation in the value of our home. And that would increase the value of our home overnight by probably 30 percent.
How exactly does that help affordable housing? How does that help someone trying to save up to buy their first home, a starter home like ours? All it does it drive the price of our starter home beyond the budget of anyone who would be in the market for a starter home.
I can't tell if the D.C. government is cynical or just stupid in how they portray policies that are designed to enrich developers and people who already own homes as somehow helping everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.
So you want to trade a minor reduction rental costs for a huge increase in the cost of buying a home? No thanks. All that is doing is increasing inequality. The way most people build wealth is by owning a home and this will make home ownership even harder.
Ummm the rent from the ADU increases the ability of the homeowner to cover the mortgage and by doing so makes the house more affordable - do you really not understand that?
But most importantly it increases the housing supply which is good for people who need housing. Which happens to be everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because even with that increase in value, the house is more affordable because it's bringing in income. And the ADU itself is affordable.
Nothing should be made better because some people might not be able to afford it. We need to suppress value in all forms. Whether it’s housing prices, or kids taking ap classes. We need to engineer specific outcomes rather than let the market work the way it should or let organic scholastic excellence prevail.
Anonymous wrote:Because even with that increase in value, the house is more affordable because it's bringing in income. And the ADU itself is affordable.
Anonymous wrote:Because even with that increase in value, the house is more affordable because it's bringing in income. And the ADU itself is affordable.
Anonymous wrote:Wait...you mean you're trying to drive housing prices down?
And if owning a house is the way "most people build wealth," then why would it be a good idea to drive housing prices down? Those people with houses wouldn't be very successful at building wealth with underwater mortgages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.
So you want to trade a minor reduction rental costs for a huge increase in the cost of buying a home? No thanks. All that is doing is increasing inequality. The way most people build wealth is by owning a home and this will make home ownership even harder.
Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.