Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is spot on. Langley might be worried about being so under-enrolled compared to the massive over-enrollment at MHS, that they may be inclined to accept whatever requests for transfer they can get. Because, you know, eventually somebody may actually do something about that glaring disparity.Anonymous wrote:For a while they were showing Langley as closed to transfers even though it remains under-enrolled.
Then they pulled the maps that had shown which schools were open and closed to transfers and said this would be re-evaluated in February and then May for the next school year.
So basically it's less transparency and you won't know until you try to secure a pupil placement. They want the process to be driven by what a student can't get at their base school, not by a desire to attend a particular school other than their base school.
Except that they're not "so" under-enrolled at this point. They are only slightly under-enrolled after the boundary adjustment, and there is a new neighborhood with 100+ houses being built that will feed to Langley. Don't you worry.![]()
It’s about 15% under capacity. That’s close to what FCPS treats as significantly under capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is spot on. Langley might be worried about being so under-enrolled compared to the massive over-enrollment at MHS, that they may be inclined to accept whatever requests for transfer they can get. Because, you know, eventually somebody may actually do something about that glaring disparity.Anonymous wrote:For a while they were showing Langley as closed to transfers even though it remains under-enrolled.
Then they pulled the maps that had shown which schools were open and closed to transfers and said this would be re-evaluated in February and then May for the next school year.
So basically it's less transparency and you won't know until you try to secure a pupil placement. They want the process to be driven by what a student can't get at their base school, not by a desire to attend a particular school other than their base school.
Except that they're not "so" under-enrolled at this point. They are only slightly under-enrolled after the boundary adjustment, and there is a new neighborhood with 100+ houses being built that will feed to Langley. Don't you worry.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Langley is a mess! Look at the staff satisfaction surveys.
If I were to pick a non-TJ school for my child, I would go to one of the academies (West Potomac, Chantilly, Madison I think?)
Langley does not have a lot of fabulous STEM offerings. The academies have a lot more.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is spot on. Langley might be worried about being so under-enrolled compared to the massive over-enrollment at MHS, that they may be inclined to accept whatever requests for transfer they can get. Because, you know, eventually somebody may actually do something about that glaring disparity.Anonymous wrote:For a while they were showing Langley as closed to transfers even though it remains under-enrolled.
Then they pulled the maps that had shown which schools were open and closed to transfers and said this would be re-evaluated in February and then May for the next school year.
So basically it's less transparency and you won't know until you try to secure a pupil placement. They want the process to be driven by what a student can't get at their base school, not by a desire to attend a particular school other than their base school.
Anonymous wrote:If your child wants to take Russian, it can work. Like a PP said, you have to provide your own transportation. Plus, you have to get the Langley Principal and the home base Principal to agree, annually.
Anonymous wrote:Since it’s underenrolled I mean.
Yes, this is spot on. Langley might be worried about being so under-enrolled compared to the massive over-enrollment at MHS, that they may be inclined to accept whatever requests for transfer they can get. Because, you know, eventually somebody may actually do something about that glaring disparity.Anonymous wrote:For a while they were showing Langley as closed to transfers even though it remains under-enrolled.
Then they pulled the maps that had shown which schools were open and closed to transfers and said this would be re-evaluated in February and then May for the next school year.
So basically it's less transparency and you won't know until you try to secure a pupil placement. They want the process to be driven by what a student can't get at their base school, not by a desire to attend a particular school other than their base school.