Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the Syracuse/Tulane of DC.
This is an accurate comment, at least in terms of one ranking. USNews has it tied for #42 for quality of undergraduate teaching, along with Tulane, Binghamton U-SUNY, Fordham, Johns Hopkins, Ohio State U-Columbus, and Syracuse.
Anonymous wrote:It’s the Syracuse/Tulane of DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you were to rank colleges solely based on percentage of classes under 30 and total number of classes offered (both of which I value highly), they would beat out every Ivy on the former and all but Cornell and Penn on the latter. It's pretty easy to beat them on one, but doing it on both is very rare--tough to be strong on both measures. The only other school I know of that beats so many of them is Northwestern.
Note: Columbia doesn't publish their Common Data Set, so not included. Their numbers seem more likely to be in line with the 5 American beats rather than Penn and Cornell.
You didn’t really mention American in the same sentence as Penn, Cornell and Columbia? Lolololol
It’s the Syracuse/Tulane of DC. Not comepetitive for good students to obtain admissions. High priced and partiers.
Too companies don’t hire there. These graduates are at the back of the line to Georgetown grads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you were to rank colleges solely based on percentage of classes under 30 and total number of classes offered (both of which I value highly), they would beat out every Ivy on the former and all but Cornell and Penn on the latter. It's pretty easy to beat them on one, but doing it on both is very rare--tough to be strong on both measures. The only other school I know of that beats so many of them is Northwestern.
Note: Columbia doesn't publish their Common Data Set, so not included. Their numbers seem more likely to be in line with the 5 American beats rather than Penn and Cornell.
You didn’t really mention American in the same sentence as Penn, Cornell and Columbia? Lolololol
It’s the Syracuse/Tulane of DC. Not comepetitive for good students to obtain admissions. High priced and partiers.
Too companies don’t hire there. These graduates are at the back of the line to Georgetown grads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you were to rank colleges solely based on percentage of classes under 30 and total number of classes offered (both of which I value highly), they would beat out every Ivy on the former and all but Cornell and Penn on the latter. It's pretty easy to beat them on one, but doing it on both is very rare--tough to be strong on both measures. The only other school I know of that beats so many of them is Northwestern.
Note: Columbia doesn't publish their Common Data Set, so not included. Their numbers seem more likely to be in line with the 5 American beats rather than Penn and Cornell.
You didn’t really mention American in the same sentence as Penn, Cornell and Columbia? Lolololol
It’s the Syracuse/Tulane of DC. Not comepetitive for good students to obtain admissions. High priced and partiers.
Too companies don’t hire there. These graduates are at the back of the line to Georgetown grads.
Anonymous wrote:If you were to rank colleges solely based on percentage of classes under 30 and total number of classes offered (both of which I value highly), they would beat out every Ivy on the former and all but Cornell and Penn on the latter. It's pretty easy to beat them on one, but doing it on both is very rare--tough to be strong on both measures. The only other school I know of that beats so many of them is Northwestern.
Note: Columbia doesn't publish their Common Data Set, so not included. Their numbers seem more likely to be in line with the 5 American beats rather than Penn and Cornell.