Anonymous wrote:We were seriously interested in liberal arts colleges. I found their faculty in CS and STEM to be second rate (look at how many CS faculty they have).
I know research is not its main focus.. then what’s the difference from good private high schools?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think there is a tremendous appeal. Has always been for near-miss kids. They all want to be at Harvard or Brown. That's the chip on the shoulder that you are observing.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think there is a tremendous appeal. Has always been for near-miss kids. They all want to be at Harvard or Brown. That's the chip on the shoulder that you are observing.
Did you visit the school? Not being snarky, but genuinely curious how you reached that conclusion. We specifically asked several students why they chose Amherst and it was a top choice for everyone we spoke to. The students were into the small, liberal arts experience and generally had other SLACs on their list (Williams & Middlebury were mentioned). Brown and Harvard would be very different schools/experiences.I don't think there is a tremendous appeal. Has always been for near-miss kids. They all want to be at Harvard or Brown. That's the chip on the shoulder that you are observing.
Anonymous wrote:Work with some private equity guys from Amherst. Really arrogant. I find Yale folks the most humble.
We didn't get this vibe at all on our tour and both guides had taken classes at one of the other colleges in the consortium - for our guides that was Smith & Mt. Holyoke. They'd both been to Greek parties at UMass, but that wasn't their go to party scene. I thought the campus was beautiful, but I know that's subjective (for reference I also liked the campus at Wellesley & Elon, but not Vassar or Duke).Snobby, condescending students who think they're big shots.