Anonymous wrote:College professor here. Yes. We expect that one of the biggest things kids learn during their first year or two is how to handle the quantity of reading, before they hit upper-level classes in which there will be substantially more.
There's always a learning curve, unless they come from a really rigorous (usually private) high school, and even then there is typically a change from a lot of homework in a lot of classes for a big overall workload in high school, to significantly fewer classes but heavier reading load in several of them.
I've taught (in the humanities) at a small college with a regional reputation, two state flagships, an ivy, and an couple of ok-but-not-great Catholic universities and I'd give the same answer for all.
NP here.
My college experience, as a STEM major at a large state university that gets mentioned on this board (but not in the DMV), was that I probably had reading for the handful of history and other humanities classes I had. But I didn't "read" texts for my STEM classes.... That is, I wasn't reading chemistry, physics, differential equations, etc. texts. I was doing HW, reviewing lecture notes, and preparing for tests.
My question to the professor is "how does the reading for your classes compare to your peer professors in science or math?"