Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
+1. Using terms like "unhoused" indicates that the speaker/ writer is aware of changes in the common vocabulary that have occurred in the last 30 minutes, but that we are all expected to be thoroughly versed on. Also a great tool to be used for judging others.
I love your answer. It's all about superiority over those less in the know.
Thank you. It's not only less in the know, it's posed superiority over those who refuse to go along with the left's "new vocabulary" on many topics.
Funny that the only superiority and judgment here is coming from the people who dislike the term unhoused.
I hear both and tend to use homeless (because it's how I hear the homeless families I work with identify themselves), and I've never once gotten pushback for it (and again, I work with homeless families professionally)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
+1. Using terms like "unhoused" indicates that the speaker/ writer is aware of changes in the common vocabulary that have occurred in the last 30 minutes, but that we are all expected to be thoroughly versed on. Also a great tool to be used for judging others.
I love your answer. It's all about superiority over those less in the know.
Thank you. It's not only less in the know, it's posed superiority over those who refuse to go along with the left's "new vocabulary" on many topics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
+1. Using terms like "unhoused" indicates that the speaker/ writer is aware of changes in the common vocabulary that have occurred in the last 30 minutes, but that we are all expected to be thoroughly versed on. Also a great tool to be used for judging others.
I love your answer. It's all about superiority over those less in the know.
Thank you. It's not only less in the know, it's posed superiority over those who refuse to go along with the left's "new vocabulary" on many topics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
+1. Using terms like "unhoused" indicates that the speaker/ writer is aware of changes in the common vocabulary that have occurred in the last 30 minutes, but that we are all expected to be thoroughly versed on. Also a great tool to be used for judging others.
I love your answer. It's all about superiority over those less in the know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
+1. Using terms like "unhoused" indicates that the speaker/ writer is aware of changes in the common vocabulary that have occurred in the last 30 minutes, but that we are all expected to be thoroughly versed on. Also a great tool to be used for judging others.
Anonymous wrote:To me these sound like the same thing. I want to understand the push towards “unhoused”. I feel like ultimately if we aren’t doing anything to help these people, why are we harping on words?
Anonymous wrote:Same thing, different name. Virtue signaling with language - indicates one is in the “in-group”.
Anonymous wrote:Shelters, weekly motel rentals, living on a friend's couch, all unhoused but not homeless.