Anonymous wrote:Ivies are about more than stats. Assume everyone is near perfect.
You should ask about what sets a successful applicant apart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The high stats just buy you the lottery ticket...
+1
People keep saying this but I got a PhD at an ivy league school and both sat in a couple classes with undergrads and taught a couple classes to undergrads. There is a sizable minority of absolute buffoons in ivy league undergrad programs. And it's not the athletes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The high stats just buy you the lottery ticket...
+1
Anonymous wrote:The high stats just buy you the lottery ticket...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivies are about more than stats. Assume everyone is near perfect.
You should ask about what sets a successful applicant apart.
+10000
I often found it funny when people ask for stats for top school admits. They totally didn't know what's going on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Princeton early
1580
4.8 weighted
Many ECs with leadership
12 APs
Asian
Large public hs, competitive state
Very charismatic person with probably excellent letters
Sounds just like my kid who was rejected, except not Asian, 10points lower in SAT, higher in WGPA. Also, top magnet program, nmsf, nat'l awards, awards in a variety of ECs. OP, it's a bit of a lottery at this level.
PP, congrats to your kid!
Anonymous wrote:Ivies are about more than stats. Assume everyone is near perfect.
You should ask about what sets a successful applicant apart.
Anonymous wrote:Princeton early
1580
4.8 weighted
Many ECs with leadership
12 APs
Asian
Large public hs, competitive state
Very charismatic person with probably excellent letters
Anonymous wrote:Princeton early
1580
4.8 weighted
Many ECs with leadership
12 APs
Asian
Large public hs, competitive state
Very charismatic person with probably excellent letters