Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's a piece of fabric that does no good. It is uncomfortable--especially for kids with glasses and it prevent learning for many kids who have speech and language difficulties. But, it does provide virtual signaling. So, there is that.
Do you even have a kid with speech and language needs, or do you just like using special needs kids as a talking point for your own purposes?
signed,
A parent of a kid with a very significant speech disorder who strongly favors masks
Anonymous wrote:
She said that the superintendent told her last year that they had to mask due to the governor’s order, and if it were up to her it would be different.
Well, new governor has removed that excuse.
Haven’t seen the superintendents deny the conversation. If there’s no denial, it’s a good indication that similar statements to others are on record somewhere (text or email perhaps)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either you wear a decent mask and continue going in person or surprise, you've become a contact and have to quarantine (this happens a lot, it's not just a one time deal) and you are home with nothing but papers as busy work. We'll stick with masks in exchange for being in person.
-- A parent with a child who wears glasses and has services for speech
My kid should not have to wear a mask just because you won’t get yours vaccinated. Advocate for TTS if you’re upset about disruptions.
Anonymous wrote:
It's a piece of fabric that does no good. It is uncomfortable--especially for kids with glasses and it prevent learning for many kids who have speech and language difficulties. But, it does provide virtual signaling. So, there is that.
Anonymous wrote:Either you wear a decent mask and continue going in person or surprise, you've become a contact and have to quarantine (this happens a lot, it's not just a one time deal) and you are home with nothing but papers as busy work. We'll stick with masks in exchange for being in person.
-- A parent with a child who wears glasses and has services for speech
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either you wear a decent mask and continue going in person or surprise, you've become a contact and have to quarantine (this happens a lot, it's not just a one time deal) and you are home with nothing but papers as busy work. We'll stick with masks in exchange for being in person.
-- A parent with a child who wears glasses and has services for speech
I don't get this comment, children with masks don't have to quarantine?
Anonymous wrote:
She said that the superintendent told her last year that they had to mask due to the governor’s order, and if it were up to her it would be different.
Well, new governor has removed that excuse.
Haven’t seen the superintendents deny the conversation. If there’s no denial, it’s a good indication that similar statements to others are on record somewhere (text or email perhaps)
Anonymous wrote:Either you wear a decent mask and continue going in person or surprise, you've become a contact and have to quarantine (this happens a lot, it's not just a one time deal) and you are home with nothing but papers as busy work. We'll stick with masks in exchange for being in person.
-- A parent with a child who wears glasses and has services for speech