Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Yeah, what is the end game? How long are they going to be overly worried about vaccinated/boosted adults? When a higher authority declares it as endemic rather than pandemic? I really want to know how long we are going to continue to ask kids to sacrifice for adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree that was really irritating. Also how is a 4 YO different from an unvaccinated 5 YO?
I am happy to hear they will allow rest to stay.
Well, a 4 year doesn't have the choice to be vaccinated, the 5 yo does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Yeah, what is the end game? How long are they going to be overly worried about vaccinated/boosted adults? When a higher authority declares it as endemic rather than pandemic? I really want to know how long we are going to continue to ask kids to sacrifice for adults.
That logic is bizarre though because wouldn’t that apply to older grades and students who are around adults? The whole thing is ridiculous.
Probably because they can be vaccinated, but I don't think I've ever seen any numbers on the likelihood of spreading the virus broken out by age and vaccination status. Like is an unvaccinated 2yo really any more likely to spread it than a 18yo vaccinated person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Yeah, what is the end game? How long are they going to be overly worried about vaccinated/boosted adults? When a higher authority declares it as endemic rather than pandemic? I really want to know how long we are going to continue to ask kids to sacrifice for adults.
That logic is bizarre though because wouldn’t that apply to older grades and students who are around adults? The whole thing is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Yeah, what is the end game? How long are they going to be overly worried about vaccinated/boosted adults? When a higher authority declares it as endemic rather than pandemic? I really want to know how long we are going to continue to ask kids to sacrifice for adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Bridgers and Stoddard later clarified kids aren’t actually at significant risk. They're worried about transmissions from the kids to adults, except that those adults can be vaccinated/boosted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree that was really irritating. Also how is a 4 YO different from an unvaccinated 5 YO?
I am happy to hear they will allow rest to stay.
Well, a 4 year doesn't have the choice to be vaccinated, the 5 yo does.
Anonymous wrote:Agree that was really irritating. Also how is a 4 YO different from an unvaccinated 5 YO?
I am happy to hear they will allow rest to stay.
Anonymous wrote:I am listening to it now. They are setting up to get you to accept stricter guidelines. I'm shocked at how many times someone has said "children under 5 are at the greatest risk." Someone should ask them exactly how. Also, why are the two healthcare officers psychologists? A Psy.D. and Ph.D. in Family Science. These are the health officers of MoCo making decisions about a virus? WTF?
Anonymous wrote:you are exhausting.
Anonymous wrote:Agree that was really irritating. Also how is a 4 YO different from an unvaccinated 5 YO?
I am happy to hear they will allow rest to stay.