Anonymous wrote:Which of these executive orders are extremist?
Anonymous wrote:Which of these executive orders are extremist?
Anonymous wrote:I think he is a moderate. Especially for American politics.
Anonymous wrote:Our media has a broad pro-Republican bias.
They called Youngkin a moderate.
Why did the media do that?
Well, first, the media that covered Youngkin is part of massive corporations – AT&T owns CNN, Comcast owns MSNBC – and the execs are generally Republicans because tax cuts help corporations even as they hurt workers.
And second, US media has decided they have to be neutral. (This isn't true for media in other countries.)
And the obvious way to exploit neutral media is to lie. Then they cover one sides' lies as equal to the other sides' truthfulness.
So Republicans like Youngkin lie.
And our media covers it as if it's true.
NYT Politics and NYT Opinion is effectively conservative in practice (yes Republican posters, I know your minds are blown, but just use your brains a little bit - everything said here is true, you must admit.).
The most popular parts of NYT are therefore conservative-biased, because they try to cover both sides equally, and one side – Glenn Youngkin's side – is a bunch of liars.
A truly liberal media would be saying the truth, at minimum: that Youngkin is an extremist.
But we have a conservative media. In practice if not in self-regard.
Anonymous wrote:Our media has a broad pro-Republican bias.
They called Youngkin a moderate.
Why did the media do that?
Well, first, the media that covered Youngkin is part of massive corporations – AT&T owns CNN, Comcast owns MSNBC – and the execs are generally Republicans because tax cuts help corporations even as they hurt workers.
And second, US media has decided they have to be neutral. (This isn't true for media in other countries.)
And the obvious way to exploit neutral media is to lie. Then they cover one sides' lies as equal to the other sides' truthfulness.
So Republicans like Youngkin lie.
And our media covers it as if it's true.
NYT Politics and NYT Opinion is effectively conservative in practice (yes Republican posters, I know your minds are blown, but just use your brains a little bit - everything said here is true, you must admit.).
The most popular parts of NYT are therefore conservative-biased, because they try to cover both sides equally, and one side – Glenn Youngkin's side – is a bunch of liars.
A truly liberal media would be saying the truth, at minimum: that Youngkin is an extremist.
But we have a conservative media. In practice if not in self-regard.
Or maybe these actions actually are moderate for mainstream America and you are the one that’s extreme….I know your mind is blown, but just use your brain a little bit.
How the New York Times laundered right-wing propaganda in a piece about Glenn Youngkin
The report featured a "Hillary-Biden" voter who's gone Republican. But some key context was missing.
A New York Times report published Sunday describes the “palpable” energy among supporters of Republican Virginia gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin with an anecdote from a man who is presented as encapsulating the rightward shift Virginia is experiencing. But his anecdote actually ended up illustrating how propaganda can be laundered into news reports.
The article, by Jeremy Peters and Matthew Cullen, quotes Miller, identified as a lawyer from McLean, as saying he decided to support Youngkin because of the exact school-related concerns that Youngkin describes as the defining issue of his campaign.
There’s just one problem — a few minutes of vetting revealed that Miller is actually an activist who mostly supports Republicans and has a history of publicly opposing critical race theory (CRT). But none of that gets mentioned in the piece.
https://aaronrupar.substack.com/p/glenn-youngkin-new-york-times-jeremy-peters
Anonymous wrote:Our media has a broad pro-Republican bias.
They called Youngkin a moderate.
Why did the media do that?
Well, first, the media that covered Youngkin is part of massive corporations – AT&T owns CNN, Comcast owns MSNBC – and the execs are generally Republicans because tax cuts help corporations even as they hurt workers.
And second, US media has decided they have to be neutral. (This isn't true for media in other countries.)
And the obvious way to exploit neutral media is to lie. Then they cover one sides' lies as equal to the other sides' truthfulness.
So Republicans like Youngkin lie.
And our media covers it as if it's true.
NYT Politics and NYT Opinion is effectively conservative in practice (yes Republican posters, I know your minds are blown, but just use your brains a little bit - everything said here is true, you must admit.).
The most popular parts of NYT are therefore conservative-biased, because they try to cover both sides equally, and one side – Glenn Youngkin's side – is a bunch of liars.
A truly liberal media would be saying the truth, at minimum: that Youngkin is an extremist.
But we have a conservative media. In practice if not in self-regard.