Anonymous wrote:If you don’t have a problem with this, you are by definition a racist, and probably a misogynist as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this legal under federal law? I’ve never heard of such an extreme action.
The GOP is an extremist authoritarian movement that seeks to destroy America as we know it and turn us into Franco's Spain.
(Franco's Spain had a brutal secret police that went after liberals and intellectuals.)
We have about 9 months to turn this around, break through the lies, and expose the GOP for what it is, or your kids will be living under an autocratic Christian regime that aims to help billionaires and harm every one of us on DCUM.
This is serious. The American experiment is at stake in the next 9 months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.
Do you understand what it means to have summarily fired the entire civil rights division.
He could have left them on the health insurance for 90 days. Same with severance. Too bad.
No, step back from what happens to the individual former employees for a moment. Do you understand what the civil rights division does, and the significance of firing everyone despite the current case load? Please explain your understanding of the implication of that, if you can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.
Do you understand what it means to have summarily fired the entire civil rights division.
He could have left them on the health insurance for 90 days. Same with severance. Too bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.
Do you understand what it means to have summarily fired the entire civil rights division.
He could have left them on the health insurance for 90 days. Same with severance. Too bad.
No, step back from what happens to the individual former employees for a moment. Do you understand what the civil rights division does, and the significance of firing everyone despite the current case load? Please explain your understanding of the implication of that, if you can.
Anonymous wrote:Is this legal under federal law? I’ve never heard of such an extreme action.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.
Do you understand what it means to have summarily fired the entire civil rights division.
He could have left them on the health insurance for 90 days. Same with severance. Too bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.
Do you understand what it means to have summarily fired the entire civil rights division.
Anonymous wrote:Oh and they've been let go without health insurance or severance. Poor babies. ACA closes today! I'd get on that.