Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the workaround they came up with on short notice seems pretty good to me.
I deal with Zoom capacity at my workplace though (everyone's licenses have capacity up to 1,000, but we have a special shared license up to 3,000 for the 6 - 10 meetings a year we need it for - and the licensing is quite complex so it isn't just "go click a button online and add more capacity"), so I'm sympathetic to this.
This is not a "workaround they came up with on short notice". The regional quarantine instructional program has been in place since September. Once cases and quarantine numbers started to skyrocket, no one bothered to figure out whether the program's Zoom licenses would be sufficient to handle the uptick. How can you be sympathetic to elementary school kids who are in quarantine having access to only 30 minutes of reading instruction and 30 minutes of math per day? That's it. 1 hour of school. Sympathetic? It's inexcusable, embarrassing and sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the workaround they came up with on short notice seems pretty good to me.
I deal with Zoom capacity at my workplace though (everyone's licenses have capacity up to 1,000, but we have a special shared license up to 3,000 for the 6 - 10 meetings a year we need it for - and the licensing is quite complex so it isn't just "go click a button online and add more capacity"), so I'm sympathetic to this.
This is not a "workaround they came up with on short notice". The regional quarantine instructional program has been in place since September. Once cases and quarantine numbers started to skyrocket, no one bothered to figure out whether the program's Zoom licenses would be sufficient to handle the uptick. How can you be sympathetic to elementary school kids who are in quarantine having access to only 30 minutes of reading instruction and 30 minutes of math per day? That's it. 1 hour of school. Sympathetic? It's inexcusable, embarrassing and sad.
Anonymous wrote:If this is not an equity-related reason to switch to virtual, I don't know what its.
MY BRAIN IS EXPLODING.
Anonymous wrote:If this is not an equity-related reason to switch to virtual, I don't know what its.
MY BRAIN IS EXPLODING.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the workaround they came up with on short notice seems pretty good to me.
I deal with Zoom capacity at my workplace though (everyone's licenses have capacity up to 1,000, but we have a special shared license up to 3,000 for the 6 - 10 meetings a year we need it for - and the licensing is quite complex so it isn't just "go click a button online and add more capacity"), so I'm sympathetic to this.
Anonymous wrote:
Hogan and others refused to restrict businesses in time, so I said before Christmas that an organized pivot to virtual would be necessary for two weeks in January, to mitigate hospital saturation and ensure that families could plan.
Parents yelled that it wasn't fair that schools should close before businesses, some claimed they preferred the daily uncertainty and potential chaos, others said they'd already closed too long in 2020-21, etc...
I know some families are regretting that a better planned and organized pivot wasn't executed.
It's sad that people come up with reasons that have nothing to do with our current situation (continuity of learning) to reject common sense measures. We didn't need to shut down for Delta, despite the spike in cases and hospitalizations. We needed to shut down briefly for Omicron, given the historic peak of hospitalizations.