Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discovery Time. My kid goes there and we love it
Which one? is it optional for pre-K too?? I didn't see that on their website.
Anonymous wrote:It's in Arlington, but Early Years Preschool doesn't require masks
Anonymous wrote:Discovery Time. My kid goes there and we love it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the question was whether a three year old was capable of wearing a mask, but if any area preschools weren’t requiring them.
Why wouldn’t you wear one if you are fully capable? We should be helping out our community, not searching for ways to be selfish.
Nope. Look at what Europe and the UK do - no masks under 5, some countries no masks under 8. Don't make toddlers carry the burden that grown adults should be carrying.
+1. Not to mention, tabulate the number of times the kids take the masks on and off all day- at our center it is 6 times. Most young kids wear cloth masks you. It’s theater. Maybe theater made sense in March 2020, but we know more now. It doesn’t make sense.
Not to turn this into a mask debate, but....
plethora of studies out there to confirm that the costs to young children of wearing masks (actual verified costs, in terms of developmental delays and psychological impacts) far exceed any supposed benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the question was whether a three year old was capable of wearing a mask, but if any area preschools weren’t requiring them.
Why wouldn’t you wear one if you are fully capable? We should be helping out our community, not searching for ways to be selfish.
Nope. Look at what Europe and the UK do - no masks under 5, some countries no masks under 8. Don't make toddlers carry the burden that grown adults should be carrying.
+1. Not to mention, tabulate the number of times the kids take the masks on and off all day- at our center it is 6 times. Most young kids wear cloth masks you. It’s theater. Maybe theater made sense in March 2020, but we know more now. It doesn’t make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the question was whether a three year old was capable of wearing a mask, but if any area preschools weren’t requiring them.
Why wouldn’t you wear one if you are fully capable? We should be helping out our community, not searching for ways to be selfish.
Nope. Look at what Europe and the UK do - no masks under 5, some countries no masks under 8. Don't make toddlers carry the burden that grown adults should be carrying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the question was whether a three year old was capable of wearing a mask, but if any area preschools weren’t requiring them.
Why wouldn’t you wear one if you are fully capable? We should be helping out our community, not searching for ways to be selfish.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the question was whether a three year old was capable of wearing a mask, but if any area preschools weren’t requiring them.