Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can’t you just do a mediocre job and not get fired? You have tenure.
No because then they make me teach more classes every term. I could do a worse job with those but there is a limit to how little you can do. Plus I hate teaching. I only took the job for the research. I would rather quit and do almost anything else than teach. I was hired because I am I am an excellent researcher, writer , analyst, programmer, physicist, chemist and project manager and understand how to get things done. Those would be highly useful elsewhere but not if I done away classroom teaching 40 hours a week and doing grading for another 20. Tenure isn’t what it used to be, friends. Even at the “elite” school where I work.
PP tenured professor who you conveniently have not responded to. I have never heard of an "elite" school without TAs for grading, so now this post is extra fishy
Anonymous wrote:You would give up tenure for some part time gig? That is crazy short sighted. And your pay is quite high for a professor outside business school.
I would stick with it.
Anonymous wrote:Okay I'm a tenured prof at an R1 school. Not engineering. I do understand you have a lot of funding pressure to support PhD students.
I'm not sure I believe you are really a professor and if you are, it sounds like you have severely, severely not cracked the code of teaching. 20 hours a week of prep for one class? 20 hours is my total prep time for the YEAR for one class, and that includes updating all my materials, revising assignments, posting everything online, etc.
With all that funding it should also be easy to hire a TA to do the grading (I'm surprised your department/school doesn't do this automatically). If you're spending more than 5 hours per week in total on teaching (outside the classroom) as a tenure-track or tenured professor, that's shocking to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can’t you just do a mediocre job and not get fired? You have tenure.
No because then they make me teach more classes every term. I could do a worse job with those but there is a limit to how little you can do. Plus I hate teaching. I only took the job for the research. I would rather quit and do almost anything else than teach. I was hired because I am I am an excellent researcher, writer , analyst, programmer, physicist, chemist and project manager and understand how to get things done. Those would be highly useful elsewhere but not if I done away classroom teaching 40 hours a week and doing grading for another 20. Tenure isn’t what it used to be, friends. Even at the “elite” school where I work.
Anonymous wrote:You have $160k a year and job security and you want the same $ for less work and less job security? (Unless govt).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can’t you just do a mediocre job and not get fired? You have tenure.
No because then they make me teach more classes every term. I could do a worse job with those but there is a limit to how little you can do. Plus I hate teaching. I only took the job for the research. I would rather quit and do almost anything else than teach. I was hired because I am I am an excellent researcher, writer , analyst, programmer, physicist, chemist and project manager and understand how to get things done. Those would be highly useful elsewhere but not if I done away classroom teaching 40 hours a week and doing grading for another 20. Tenure isn’t what it used to be, friends. Even at the “elite” school where I work.
Anonymous wrote:Can’t you just do a mediocre job and not get fired? You have tenure.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. I make about $160k so not that much by DCUM standards, although benefits are pretty good by industry standards probably less than fed.