Anonymous wrote:Antiquated, man-led medicinal theories from the last century had led to documented trauma among obstetric and gynecological patients.
My husband is a doctor (non-ON/GYN) and during both my pregnancies, could find no justification why cervical checks are done so often, why pregnant mothers are so often put on their backs, which is very uncomfortable, why so many things are done in gynecology and obstetrics, except that they are convenient for the medical team and there have not been enough female doctors that have risen to lead departments and conduct research, to effect change and rewrite medical textbooks. If men had to endure these procedures, you bet there would have been different protocols in place a long time ago!
There should be a sensible balance between medical precaution, provider convenience and mothers' physical comfort and psychological needs. Too often, that last part is brushed aside entirely.
I refused cervical checks, and indeed, went with a midwife practice, for my second pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Antiquated, man-led medicinal theories from the last century had led to documented trauma among obstetric and gynecological patients.
My husband is a doctor (non-ON/GYN) and during both my pregnancies, could find no justification why cervical checks are done so often, why pregnant mothers are so often put on their backs, which is very uncomfortable, why so many things are done in gynecology and obstetrics, except that they are convenient for the medical team and there have not been enough female doctors that have risen to lead departments and conduct research, to effect change and rewrite medical textbooks. If men had to endure these procedures, you bet there would have been different protocols in place a long time ago!
There should be a sensible balance between medical precaution, provider convenience and mothers' physical comfort and psychological needs. Too often, that last part is brushed aside entirely.
I refused cervical checks, and indeed, went with a midwife practice, for my second pregnancy.
Women can be worse than men. "I went through all of this too, why are you being such a baby?"
Anonymous wrote:Antiquated, man-led medicinal theories from the last century had led to documented trauma among obstetric and gynecological patients.
My husband is a doctor (non-ON/GYN) and during both my pregnancies, could find no justification why cervical checks are done so often, why pregnant mothers are so often put on their backs, which is very uncomfortable, why so many things are done in gynecology and obstetrics, except that they are convenient for the medical team and there have not been enough female doctors that have risen to lead departments and conduct research, to effect change and rewrite medical textbooks. If men had to endure these procedures, you bet there would have been different protocols in place a long time ago!
There should be a sensible balance between medical precaution, provider convenience and mothers' physical comfort and psychological needs. Too often, that last part is brushed aside entirely.
I refused cervical checks, and indeed, went with a midwife practice, for my second pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:I read somewhere that cervical checks are pretty inaccurate in addition to being uncomfortable. This checks out for me, as during my first labor I was told I was 6cm only to be told I was 5cm two hours later by a different doc. Is there literature on this? Any alternatives for determining whether labor is progressing?
Anonymous wrote:Cervical checks were 100% the absolute worst part of my first labour. Which was unmediated. Even pushing didn’t hurt that much. Second labour I only had to have one (I mostly refused them because they were so horrible the first time around) and it wasn’t nearly as bad. Not sure if this was because my body was in more used to the whole labour thing (which was overall less awful the second time around) or something to do with the baby’s position but that was my experience.