Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the mineral taste of the NZ Sauvignon Blancs better than the bland California varieties. Kim Crawford is an average wine, but I don’t consider it sweet.
This is OP - that is interesting bc Cloudy Bay and Oyster Bay are my go-to sauvignon blancs. I wanted something a bit less expensive since I was buying a lot
of wines and liquor for the day/dinner 😊.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the mineral taste of the NZ Sauvignon Blancs better than the bland California varieties. Kim Crawford is an average wine, but I don’t consider it sweet.
This is OP - that is interesting bc Cloudy Bay and Oyster Bay are my go-to sauvignon blancs. I wanted something a bit less expensive since I was buying a lot
of wines and liquor for the day/dinner 😊.
PP. Those are excellent go-to choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the mineral taste of the NZ Sauvignon Blancs better than the bland California varieties. Kim Crawford is an average wine, but I don’t consider it sweet.
This is OP - that is interesting bc Cloudy Bay and Oyster Bay are my go-to sauvignon blancs. I wanted something a bit less expensive since I was buying a lot
of wines and liquor for the day/dinner 😊.
Anonymous wrote:It is very interesting how the same wine can taste so different to different people. The very last word I would use to describe this wine is “sweet.” I find it to be very acidic, and almost soap-like in its harshness. But I know a lot of people who love it.
I would never buy several bottles of wine to serve at a holiday meal without tasting it. Hopefully next time you’ll be able to try something first.
Anonymous wrote:I like the mineral taste of the NZ Sauvignon Blancs better than the bland California varieties. Kim Crawford is an average wine, but I don’t consider it sweet.
Anonymous wrote:I like the mineral taste of the NZ Sauvignon Blancs better than the bland California varieties. Kim Crawford is an average wine, but I don’t consider it sweet.