Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bigger question I'd ask is are indoor sports are even going to continue in January or are the going to pause as we prioritize indoor school the way things went this week. Sorry to say, but Wondering how relevant this even ultimately is....

Agree with this. There's no way basketball is coming back Until February if at all.

https://time.com/6131104/rethinking-covid-19-restrictions-2022/

Anonymous wrote:Bigger question I'd ask is are indoor sports are even going to continue in January or are the going to pause as we prioritize indoor school the way things went this week. Sorry to say, but Wondering how relevant this even ultimately is....

Agree with this. There's no way basketball is coming back Until February if at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why couldn’t they play the game even though they were in virtual? Serious question. Parents are being fed the line that virtual learning is just as good as in person. They were “in school.” Why did they choose to forfeit?

They didn’t choose to forfeit. DCIAA told them that was the result of the game.

This. It was a forced forfeit. Wilson boys WANTED to play and didn’t have any sick kids.

Anonymous wrote:Are you talking about the girls basketball team? If so, I believe it will be rescheduled. So it’s not a forfeit.

Boys. A reschedule wasn’t an option.

DCIAA is administered by DCPS. Complain to you ANC

Anonymous wrote:Why couldn’t they play the game even though they were in virtual? Serious question. Parents are being fed the line that virtual learning is just as good as in person. They were “in school.” Why did they choose to forfeit?

They didn’t choose to forfeit. DCIAA told them that was the result of the game.

Are you talking about the girls basketball team? If so, I believe it will be rescheduled. So it’s not a forfeit.

Bigger question I'd ask is are indoor sports are even going to continue in January or are the going to pause as we prioritize indoor school the way things went this week. Sorry to say, but Wondering how relevant this even ultimately is....

Why couldn’t they play the game even though they were in virtual? Serious question. Parents are being fed the line that virtual learning is just as good as in person. They were “in school.” Why did they choose to forfeit?

This is completely unfair and all games should have been rescheduled over the past week and a half. Such an unfair punishment. They really do not incentivize people to be honest about Covid.

I believe the rules are you can’t be absent from school and still play, but if virtual school is the same as regular school, why are they saying the kids weren’t “in school”? The kids weren’t absent if they logged in, right? Why penalize them because the district didn’t have enough subs?

Anonymous wrote:Why is sports more important than public health?

I’m not saying the game should not have been canceled, I’m saying it’s unfair that one school got a forfeit on their record for something that is beyond their control. It should be a no contest or the game should be rescheduled.I could see if they had to cancel because their players had COVID hit the league canceled the game because Wilson was not in person that day, not for public health reasons.

Why is sports more important than public health?

*beyond

What in the world would make this fair? The league gave Wilson basketball a forfeit for not playing on the last day they were virtual. Why penalize a team for a call the district made for something that is behind their control? They didn’t even have any positive players.