Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a huge improvement because the dept of ed can now focus on raising standards, covid remediation, literacy, math and science skills instead of its constant focus on equity, lowering standards and social justice over the past few years.
Parents should be very optimistic about the changes.
Just having a Secretary of Education focus on the education part of their title will be such a welcome change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a huge improvement because the dept of ed can now focus on raising standards, covid remediation, literacy, math and science skills instead of its constant focus on equity, lowering standards and social justice over the past few years.
Parents should be very optimistic about the changes.
Just having a Secretary of Education focus on the education part of their title will be such a welcome change.
+100.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a huge improvement because the dept of ed can now focus on raising standards, covid remediation, literacy, math and science skills instead of its constant focus on equity, lowering standards and social justice over the past few years.
Parents should be very optimistic about the changes.
Just having a Secretary of Education focus on the education part of their title will be such a welcome change.
Anonymous wrote:It will be a huge improvement because the dept of ed can now focus on raising standards, covid remediation, literacy, math and science skills instead of its constant focus on equity, lowering standards and social justice over the past few years.
Parents should be very optimistic about the changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question here. How is a charter school different from a typical public school? If a charter school is beneficial and receives tax dollars, why not allow public schools to operate in the same manner as charter schools? Whatever the model, why not apply to both?
I can tell you right now the biggest difference is charters can decide who enrolls and who doesn’t.
But yet they will receive state money?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question here. How is a charter school different from a typical public school? If a charter school is beneficial and receives tax dollars, why not allow public schools to operate in the same manner as charter schools? Whatever the model, why not apply to both?
I can tell you right now the biggest difference is charters can decide who enrolls and who doesn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question here. How is a charter school different from a typical public school? If a charter school is beneficial and receives tax dollars, why not allow public schools to operate in the same manner as charter schools? Whatever the model, why not apply to both?
I can tell you right now the biggest difference is charters can decide who enrolls and who doesn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Serious question here. How is a charter school different from a typical public school? If a charter school is beneficial and receives tax dollars, why not allow public schools to operate in the same manner as charter schools? Whatever the model, why not apply to both?
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a big improvement over Atif Qarni.
FCPS parents should ask VDOE to demand a data-driven analysis as to whether IB is correlated with improved or reduced student outcomes in FCPS.
Obviously they will push for some charters. Maybe we can see how kids at a charter perform compared to kids at a neglected Lewis or Mount Vernon, where all FCPS has to offer is IB and a “social justice” Academy program.