Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very, very people doubt Jesus as a historical figure (which is entirely separate from Christianity).
Virtually all non-Christians recognize that such a person existed, much in the way that Cleopatra, Napoleon, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Gandhi, or any number of other historical figures existed. And then died as the 100% mortals they were.
LOL. You're comparing the "evidence" that Napolean or Gandhi existed with the evidence that Jesus existed?
As discussed on the other thread, Socrates is a closer comparison. But even he had contemporary evidence.
Yes, please. Let’s rehash the same arguments we all made yesterday.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Certainly Paul was be-bopping all over Ancient Rome writing letters and starting churches within 50 years of his death. And his writings and behavior are much too organized to believe he was schizophrenic. So, where did this theology come from? Was there some group of crazy people who made it all up, including a central figure who never existed?
Did someone say he was schizophrenic? I think some people liked the message, and wanted to belong to the various church communities (like today), but the Christians were a minor and inconsequential sect for 300 years until the emperor Constantine converted. Read A.N. Wilson's biography of Paul as to why he did it (he was convinced the Christian god could deliver military victories which, of course, included booty for him and his men).. That was Christianity's big break.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Certainly Paul was be-bopping all over Ancient Rome writing letters and starting churches within 50 years of his death. And his writings and behavior are much too organized to believe he was schizophrenic. So, where did this theology come from? Was there some group of crazy people who made it all up, including a central figure who never existed?
Did someone say he was schizophrenic? I think some people liked the message, and wanted to belong to the various church communities (like today), but the Christians were a minor and inconsequential sect for 300 years until the emperor Constantine converted. Read A.N. Wilson's biography of Paul as to why he did it (he was convinced the Christian god could deliver military victories which, of course, included booty for him and his men).. That was Christianity's big break.
Anonymous wrote:Certainly Paul was be-bopping all over Ancient Rome writing letters and starting churches within 50 years of his death. And his writings and behavior are much too organized to believe he was schizophrenic. So, where did this theology come from? Was there some group of crazy people who made it all up, including a central figure who never existed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very, very people doubt Jesus as a historical figure (which is entirely separate from Christianity).
Virtually all non-Christians recognize that such a person existed, much in the way that Cleopatra, Napoleon, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Gandhi, or any number of other historical figures existed. And then died as the 100% mortals they were.
LOL. You're comparing the "evidence" that Napolean or Gandhi existed with the evidence that Jesus existed?
As discussed on the other thread, Socrates is a closer comparison. But even he had contemporary evidence.
Yes, please. Let’s rehash the same arguments we all made yesterday.
https://i.ibb.co/qsnYvxL/88859-C1330-C35-D-47-C7-BCCA-FF6-DF38815-A4-BC.jpg" ></a><br /><a target='_blank' href='https://imgbb.com/'>post pics</a><br />" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very, very people doubt Jesus as a historical figure (which is entirely separate from Christianity).
Virtually all non-Christians recognize that such a person existed, much in the way that Cleopatra, Napoleon, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Gandhi, or any number of other historical figures existed. And then died as the 100% mortals they were.
LOL. You're comparing the "evidence" that Napolean or Gandhi existed with the evidence that Jesus existed?
As discussed on the other thread, Socrates is a closer comparison. But even he had contemporary evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Very, very people doubt Jesus as a historical figure (which is entirely separate from Christianity).
Virtually all non-Christians recognize that such a person existed, much in the way that Cleopatra, Napoleon, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Gandhi, or any number of other historical figures existed. And then died as the 100% mortals they were.
Anonymous wrote:Nope, not rehashing all this again because OP is a bored and wants to stir the pot.
OP, read the “Why Believe” thread for evidence that Jesus existed.