Can we focus on 9 and 10 year old girls not getting pregnant in the first place?

It’s fairly recent history(~70 years) that girls as young as 9 started menstruating. This is due to improved nutrition. Their bones, widening of hips) has not changed. This entire topic is disgusting and abusive.

Anonymous wrote:I no longer think that pro lifers care about child abuse. Abortion has nothing to do with their cause. It is all about punishing women.
I do not even see them support causes related to women's access to birth control

Please don’t refer to them as “prolife”, ever. They created that term to insinuate anyone that supports abortion is against life. No only is that insulting to pro-choice advocates, COVID and the rights opposition to any policy that supports families, especially children has exposed how little these people care about “life.”

We need to stop repeating their framing. Call them what they are: anti-abortion. They are literally against abortion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Horrible and coming to every red state

The war on women is real and Trumper’s thank you so much did this horrific issue. Ugh

You can thank the left for getting Trump elected in the first place.
[…]

Blames Democrats for how Republicans vote, cites a list of Republican talking points to explain why.

This is the world the GOP wants. It’s not about “life,” it’s about hating women and control.

I no longer think that pro lifers care about child abuse. Abortion has nothing to do with their cause. It is all about punishing women.
I do not even see them support causes related to women's access to birth control

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Horrible and coming to every red state

The war on women is real and Trumper’s thank you so much did this horrific issue. Ugh

You can thank the left for getting Trump elected in the first place.
Stop pushing identity politics, de facto open borders, and stop reverse discrimination and erasing definition of male and female, and you will have the moderates and independents on board. Normal people do not want 9 and 10 year olds forced to carry pregnancy to term.
As long as we aren’t quite in Handmaid’s Tale, the wealthy will always have options.
I’ve plenty of money and my kids are dual citizens in country where they would be able to access abortion freely.
I would do anything to prevent my 10 year old daughter having to carry pregnancy to term.
These people are monsters.

The people responsible for electing Trump are the people who voted for him.

That being said, Trump had nothing to do with this law. Texans passed it all by themselves. Trump's SCOTUS nominees may uphold it, but that doesn't change the fact that it was Texans who passed it.

How else will men control women if they can’t force us to have kids and care for them??

Anonymous wrote:Horrible and coming to every red state

The war on women is real and Trumper’s thank you so much did this horrific issue. Ugh

You can thank the left for getting Trump elected in the first place.
Stop pushing identity politics, de facto open borders, and stop reverse discrimination and erasing definition of male and female, and you will have the moderates and independents on board. Normal people do not want 9 and 10 year olds forced to carry pregnancy to term.
As long as we aren’t quite in Handmaid’s Tale, the wealthy will always have options.
I’ve plenty of money and my kids are dual citizens in country where they would be able to access abortion freely.
I would do anything to prevent my 10 year old daughter having to carry pregnancy to term.
These people are monsters.

It’s an absolutely indefensible position to claim that it’s safe for 9 and 10 year olds to give birth, just because they’ve begun ovulating. Fistulas, anyone? Even teens can develop lifelong damage from pregnancy. Just because a body *can* does not mean it *should.*

And an actual child? These people are just beyond effed up.

Anonymous wrote:If boys could have babies, abortion clinics would be scattered around like 7-11s.

Drive-thru 7-11s.

I think it's fine for those poor children of conservatives to give birth at 9 or 10 too. I mean, it will mess up several generations of their family.

I know of what I speak: my southern great grandma gave birth at 13 and was married the year before that. Almost every generation has a girl who gets pregnant by 15, and then most of her descendants live in poverty. Those poor girls will just think it's "normal" and then their daughters will have babies by 14 too.

Horrible and coming to every red state

The war on women is real and Trumper’s thank you so much did this horrific issue. Ugh

For a little bit more text without having to click through:

A few years ago I started a thread in which I stated that forced birthers were monsters; I seem to recall that I got a lot of pushback about “life” and “different opinions.” I think the last few years have proved me right.

If boys could have babies, abortion clinics would be scattered around like 7-11s.

Only someone with a cold, dead heart would put a fetus above the life of a 9 year old child, and think it's better to force a child to carry a pregnancy to term than to terminate. And yet here we are today. This kind of extremist, barbaric thinking is spreading throughout the anti-abortion movement.

I'm sure there are some anti-abortionists who will claim they are more moderate and would not want children to be forced to go through labor and delivery. But I am skeptical they will ever fight against this part of their movement as long as it means they get to rob adult women of their bodily autonomy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/26/health/texas-abortion-law-risky-pregnancy.html

Dr. Ingrid Skop, an obstetrician in San Antonio who belongs to the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that even a girl as young as 9 or 10, impregnated by a father or a brother, could carry a baby to term without health risks.

“If she is developed enough to be menstruating and become pregnant, and reached sexual maturity, she can safely give birth to a baby,” Dr. Skop said.