Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fear we'll very likely see increasing effects in the areas of charitable giving and volunteerism as religious affinity weakens. Our society is just not developing enough civic-mindedness in secular individuals to make up the difference and the government sure isn't either.
http://marripedia.org/effects_of_religious_practice_on_charity
Too bad that you think people's generosity is so tied to the hope for eternal life that people won't be generous with their time or money unless they believe it will assure them a place in heaven.
Well, church-going conservatives give more to charity than atheist liberals, so I'd say that's a fair assessment.
"Religious practice is the behavioral variable most consistently associated with generous giving. Charitable effort correlates strongly with the frequency with which a person attends religious services. Evangelical Protestants and Mormons in particular are strong givers. Compared to Protestant affiliation, both Catholic affiliation and Jewish affiliation reduce the scope of average giving, when other influences are held constant.
Finer-grain numbers from the PSID show that the faithful don’t just give to religious causes; they are also much more likely to give to secular causes than the non-religious. Among Americans who report that they “never” attend religious services, just less than half give any money at all to secular causes. People who attend services 27-52 times per year, though, give money to secular charities in two thirds of all cases. (See page 1138.)
Sociologist Robert Putnam has chronicled the many pro-social and philanthropic overflow effects of religious practice. Not only is half of all American personal philanthropy and half of all volunteering directly religious in character, but nearly half of all associational membership in the U.S. is church-related. Religious practice links us in webs of mutual knowledge, responsibility, and support like no other influence.
Indeed, faith is as important as basic financial success in increasing giving. And religious conviction is often what separates one sub-group from another when it comes to charitable practice. For instance, African Americans, who are generally more religious than whites, are consequently 18 percent bigger givers when households of the same income, region, education, and so forth are compared."
https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/almanac/statistics/who-gives
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fear we'll very likely see increasing effects in the areas of charitable giving and volunteerism as religious affinity weakens. Our society is just not developing enough civic-mindedness in secular individuals to make up the difference and the government sure isn't either.
http://marripedia.org/effects_of_religious_practice_on_charity
Too bad that you think people's generosity is so tied to the hope for eternal life that people won't be generous with their time or money unless they believe it will assure them a place in heaven.
Anonymous wrote:I fear we'll very likely see increasing effects in the areas of charitable giving and volunteerism as religious affinity weakens. Our society is just not developing enough civic-mindedness in secular individuals to make up the difference and the government sure isn't either.
http://marripedia.org/effects_of_religious_practice_on_charity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is hope after all.
I don't know. I am an atheist myself, but some of these churches do a lot of good: fostering social connections, helping the poor etc.
I think it is mainly the mainstream protestant and catholic churches that are losing members, the crazy anti-vaccine pro-Trump gospel of prosperity ones are doing fine...
And what are we replacing the church-going with? How do we form the social bonds that we need to stop polarization and isolation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is hope after all.
I don't know. I am an atheist myself, but some of these churches do a lot of good: fostering social connections, helping the poor etc.
I think it is mainly the mainstream protestant and catholic churches that are losing members, the crazy anti-vaccine pro-Trump gospel of prosperity ones are doing fine...
And what are we replacing the church-going with? How do we form the social bonds that we need to stop polarization and isolation?
Like other nations do - with government safety nets. Subsidized daycares for everyone, not just piecemeal stuff for people connected to a church. Universal health care instead of Go-fund-mes and church meal trains. Parental leave for mothers and fathers instead of getting someone at church to watch your first kid while you're in the hospital giving birth to your second kid.
The USA is so backward in this social area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is hope after all.
I don't know. I am an atheist myself, but some of these churches do a lot of good: fostering social connections, helping the poor etc.
I think it is mainly the mainstream protestant and catholic churches that are losing members, the crazy anti-vaccine pro-Trump gospel of prosperity ones are doing fine...
And what are we replacing the church-going with? How do we form the social bonds that we need to stop polarization and isolation?
Anonymous wrote:There is hope after all.
