Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
I really disagree with this. Swimming is the one activity where I push and start them young. Swim team is too large to teach them.
I’ve been happy with Swim Labs.
my kids are on a very large summer swim team. They did the toddler rec programs and joined the team when they were 6 and learned that way. They do club swim now
My kids would never have been able to meet the minimum standard to join without swim lessons. My 7 year old still can’t. I don’t think your advice applies to most/many kids.
I agree. I am the kids first poster. My now 9yo started at 3.5 and was swimming well by 5. She did their little swim team. Well this past summer she did summer swim at our pool for the first time and then had to try out for year round swim. Had to swim several laps of backstroke, free a d breaststroke. She got in, the team is not one of the super competitive ones but she still had to show skill and stamina to get in.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
I really disagree with this. Swimming is the one activity where I push and start them young. Swim team is too large to teach them.
I’ve been happy with Swim Labs.
my kids are on a very large summer swim team. They did the toddler rec programs and joined the team when they were 6 and learned that way. They do club swim now
My kids would never have been able to meet the minimum standard to join without swim lessons. My 7 year old still can’t. I don’t think your advice applies to most/many kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
I really disagree with this. Swimming is the one activity where I push and start them young. Swim team is too large to teach them.
I’ve been happy with Swim Labs.
my kids are on a very large summer swim team. They did the toddler rec programs and joined the team when they were 6 and learned that way. They do club swim now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
I really disagree with this. Swimming is the one activity where I push and start them young. Swim team is too large to teach them.
I’ve been happy with Swim Labs.
Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
disagree with this. For young kids the temp of the water matters, and the class size matters to in a 30 min class. 2 or 3 kids less means more actual swim time for your kid.Anonymous wrote:if the goal is being able to swim, a rec center will get them there too. If the goal is club swim, a rec center followed by stroke school will get them there. If the goal is summer swim, the pool will end up teaching them how to swim as long as the meet the minimum standard for 6 year olds. I'd sure there is some outcome where goldfish is better, but for the majority of people it's an unnecessary expense
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Can't compare to other options but my kids both started there at three and are now good swimmers. I like the fact that their lessons are continuous and the pool is heated. They put four kids to a lane and seem to do a good job with the little ones.
Anonymous wrote:So we did kids first not Goldfish but had friends that did Goldfish. Both places keep the water at 90 degrees which in itself is huge for younger kids imo. You can see the swim lessons at the rec centers and the little kids spend most of the class shivering. Kids first was 6 week sessions and you stay in whatever level you’re at til the next session. My understanding of Goldfish is that they can move kids up as soon as they’re ready. So may cost more per class but you’d kid keeps moving up based on ability so might save in the long run.