Anonymous wrote:
Now I live in FFX County and, originally, it didn't cross my mind that we would consider sending our kids to private school. I currently have a child in 9th, 7th, 5th in one of the sought after pyramids. It has been a huge disappointment, most especially elementary school. They don't teach grammar, they don't teach writing, they don't teach good basic study habits. Other than math instruction, I found elementary education entirely lacking. Middle school was MUCH better, but even there, why do the kids read two (not very challenging) books a year in English class?? Partly because the poor English teachers were playing catch up as they tried to teach advanced grammar to kids who don't know their parts of speech. If I had money to burn, I would absolutely send them all to the strongest private school that would accept them.
Anonymous wrote:The key thing that you said is: “when I went to university”. The students accepted at the university you attended are likely quite similar to each other in terms of the admission standards. You also went to a “top public school” which is not a guaranteed thing for all kids.
If you really want to know the difference between public and private schools in a given area, you should look at what happens in the population of ALL of the kids — not just the ones selected by a particular university. Private schools will have much higher rates of college acceptance compared to most non-magnet public schools. Middle of the road average students may get a lot more support and direction at private schools. Most private high schools will have admissions counselors to support students in finding the right colleges for them.
So, whether private school is a “waste” or not depends upon the particular schools you’re comparing, the resources available in the community ant the particular family, and the needs of the individual student — not just SATs.
I attended both public schools and a top tier Ivy. I get the differences between having ample resources and not harping them.
tldr: It would be great if all public schools had the same resources as your top public HS in California in the ‘90s.
They don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to a public school in the 90s, it was one of the top public high schools in California. When I went to university, I noticed very little difference between those who went to public vs private schools. The SAT scores in DC private schools are basically comparable to the top publics. I don't get it, i mean if you got millions to burn, so be it. I rather give my kids a house.
Let's translate:
I don't understand why everyone doesn't think exactly the way I do.
Anonymous wrote:I went to a public school in the 90s, it was one of the top public high schools in California. When I went to university, I noticed very little difference between those who went to public vs private schools. The SAT scores in DC private schools are basically comparable to the top publics. I don't get it, i mean if you got millions to burn, so be it. I rather give my kids a house.