Seems like she should sue the clinic that performed her procedures. I've had CoolSculpting, and PAH was discussed (and I think I had to even sign a release about it).

Also, she had a *lot* of treatments in a very short time. Unless she is just describing the number of places she had it done, I don't understand how that's even possible...

There is her in 2013 and against in 2015. You can see her trying to cover up her weight gain with floating fabric that didn't emphasize her figure for years ahead of the CoolSculpting.

She got fat because she had a drinking problem. She tried to get rid of the fat with a procedure that didn't work and now she is suing.

hahaha. Good luck lady.

It's gradual weight gain and an addiction to plastic surgery. Oh well. They'll laugh her out of court. $50 million. Please.

Anonymous wrote:Found photos https://twitter.com/peacebang/status/1441239509983715329?s=20

Found photos https://twitter.com/peacebang/status/1441239509983715329?s=20

Anyone have photos?

Linda gave birth to her only child in 2006. What a coincidence she decides to file a major lawsuit for $50 million against a company, two years before her son ages out of child support. I honestly can't believe it. /s

Linda Evangelista is back in Manhattan's family court, reportedly asking for $46,000 a month in child support from billionaire and PPR chief François-Henri Pinault for their five-year-old son, Augustin.

A lot of numbers are being thrown around in the courtroom (including the $12 million in a trust set aside for Valentina, Pinault's 4-year-old daughter with wife Salma Hayek), appropriate for a hearing involving the supermodel who once wouldn't get out of bed for less than $10,000.

https://www.elle.com/fashion/news/a16656/linda-evangelista-commands-up-to-100000-for-runway-appearances-41978/

Anonymous wrote:The issue is the toxic culture that led her to believe she needed the procedure in the first place.

This 100%

All of her complaining doesn't mention she had the CoolSculpting procedure in 2016.

She's been missing from the red carpet and runway since 2012 and even then she looked like a man. In other words, she's an aging supermodel who married too early, spent all her money and divorced is just looking for a payday.

Exactly like Paulina Porizkova.

Anonymous wrote:I realize a bunch of people, maybe including the OP, are gonna be all "she was so beautiful why did she play with fire" but honestly, this was a rare complication that isn't fair and robs her of a log of dignity. It's sad for her regardless of whether or not she's a rich supermodel.

I'm the OP and I wasn't thinking that. I'm glad she's shedding light on possible complications this procedure can cause. Yes, it is sad.

Anonymous wrote:I realize a bunch of people, maybe including the OP, are gonna be all "she was so beautiful why did she play with fire" but honestly, this was a rare complication that isn't fair and robs her of a log of dignity. It's sad for her regardless of whether or not she's a rich supermodel.

It's so sad but she didn't need to mess with herself in the pursuit of what, beauty? She was drop dead gorgeous. I feel badly for her because that's what she relied on, her physical beauty and I don't mean anything rude by that, only compassion.

The issue is the toxic culture that led her to believe she needed the procedure in the first place.

I realize a bunch of people, maybe including the OP, are gonna be all "she was so beautiful why did she play with fire" but honestly, this was a rare complication that isn't fair and robs her of a log of dignity. It's sad for her regardless of whether or not she's a rich supermodel.

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/linda-evangelista-lawsuit-zeltiq-1231325/

She says that Coolscupting left her deformed by a increasing fat cells and leaving her unrecognizable.