Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond
This is really great. In particular for a club w this type of win/loss record. Go's to show that coaches can identify talent no matter where they fall in ranking.
Disagree. I think it goes to show it's about the relationship your club director has with the colleges. This was not the best team Capital has ever put forward, but they pulled strings for these players without question-- probably because of all the drama with Pride, new owner, and wanting to assert their dominance once and for all. It's clear to all where you want to play.
The (meaningless) win/loss record most likely can be traced to the depth of talent on 2023 blue. Capital gives all equal playing time.
Advocacy is an important role for every club, but the college coaches know what they are doing. As said many times on this thread, Capital 23 Blue has some strong players, and the first round of commits prove this out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond
This is really great. In particular for a club w this type of win/loss record. Go's to show that coaches can identify talent no matter where they fall in ranking.
Disagree. I think it goes to show it's about the relationship your club director has with the colleges. This was not the best team Capital has ever put forward, but they pulled strings for these players without question-- probably because of all the drama with Pride, new owner, and wanting to assert their dominance once and for all. It's clear to all where you want to play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond
This is really great. In particular for a club w this type of win/loss record. Go's to show that coaches can identify talent no matter where they fall in ranking.
Disagree. I think it goes to show it's about the relationship your club director has with the colleges. This was not the best team Capital has ever put forward, but they pulled strings for these players without question-- probably because of all the drama with Pride, new owner, and wanting to assert their dominance once and for all. It's clear to all where you want to play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond
This is really great. In particular for a club w this type of win/loss record. Go's to show that coaches can identify talent no matter where they fall in ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond
Anonymous wrote:Two weeks into the open recruiting season and this is what we know:
Capital Verbals:
(2) Virginia
(1) USNA
(1) Michigan
(1) Harvard
(1) Richmond