Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]February 14th was when the amended complaint was due, and Blake was fishing for additional plaintiffs.  When that didn’t work it, she might have been shopping for statements of support.[/quote]

That's a good point about the amended complaint, which Lively got extended to 2/18.  It's extremely hard for me to imagine Gottlieb connecting a statement of support to the release of 10 years of personal messages imho, whereas with the PO there is some legitimate connection behind getting a third party brief in support and enforcing confidentiality of those messages at least.  Probably just our different perspectives on the parties here, ha.

But wrt the amended complaint, Gottlieb also could have been talking to Venable about what, if any, statements in that complaint Swift/Venable might be comfortable attesting to, as a witness to the screenwriting conversation, or as a friend witnessing Lively's distress about the shoot etc.  Seems like if so, the answer was nothing.  It's also possible that in connection with that complaint discussion, Gottlieb could have approached the possibility of a statement of support from Swift.  I'm not sure the PR end of things is really his thing, but it's possible I guess.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics