Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "The Blind Side scandal"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]As was pointed out a few pages back: No interest of Michael Oher’s was served by being put under conservatorship. None. The Tuohys told him that a conservatorship is equivalent to adoption. That is simply a lie. It is false. Then they repeated that lie in public for decades- “Adoptive mother or Michael Oher, 50k per speech,” on Leigh Anne’s website. Why did they put him under conservatorship, and lie about it? In order to exploit that young man for Ole Miss and community clout, and to revel in their image as benevolent good Christian whites. See exhibit A: https://bellejar.ca/2014/12/15/leigh-anne-tuohy-racism-and-the-white-saviour-complex/comment-page-7/ See exhibit B: https://www.stylemepretty.com/vault/image/5127891 From this gag worthy article: https://www.stylemepretty.com/2016/10/27/the-blind-side-collins-tuohy-wedding-photos/ The people in this family are as self involved and self satisfied as can be. They are so far up their own asses that they actually probably believe that they saved “that poor boy”, and that they did it for pure Christian reasons. But that is just not true. As far as the legal stuff goes… I will leave that to others. But neither they nor their rabidly publicity minded legal team should succeed in getting you to accept a false picture of their motives and actions. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics