Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t understand why the Times didn’t just wait for the complaint to become publicly available.[/quote]

Something I’m curious about is: the complaint was going to become public anyways, right? And Justin’s reputation would have been damaged eventually. So what does the NYTimes’ early reporting change, exactly?[/quote]

The California complaint would not have become public.[/quote]

I could have sworn someone here said it would have, and I saw someone in another forum saying it would have, so I guess people are just lying out of their asses?

Anyways, that’s crazy then. I don’t understand does that does not then utterly weaken the Times case. Yes they’re reporting on a document but on a document they shouldn’t even have.[/quote]

As the complaining party, Blake was free to share it with them.  The problem with the article is that it claims to be based on hours of investigation, not just review of the complaint.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics