Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t understand why the Times didn’t just wait for the complaint to become publicly available.[/quote] Something I’m curious about is: the complaint was going to become public anyways, right? And Justin’s reputation would have been damaged eventually. So what does the NYTimes’ early reporting change, exactly?[/quote] The California complaint would not have become public.[/quote] I could have sworn someone here said it would have, and I saw someone in another forum saying it would have, so I guess people are just lying out of their asses? Anyways, that’s crazy then. I don’t understand does that does not then utterly weaken the Times case. Yes they’re reporting on a document but on a document they shouldn’t even have.[/quote] *I don’t understand how that does not then … [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
