Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm glad someone read the article and summarized it (most like by AI... wink). What the article failed to mentjon was that the Presidential Records Act wasn't passed until 1978, ten years after this crime. However, the espionage act (passed in 1917) did exist in 1968. In Trumps case, Smith used the PRA to raid Mar-A-Lago, yet prosecuted under the espionage act. Confusing, but still illegal according to Jack Smith but crickets... [/quote] The PRA was not used to search Mar-a-Lago. It could not have been because it is not a criminal statute and search warrants are only available when searching for evidence of a crime. The warrant specifically cites the statutes, which are 18 USC 793, 2071, and 1519. 793 is the Espionage Act. None of those are the PRA.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
