Reply to Lock him up indictment FL

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm glad someone read the article and summarized it (most like by AI... wink).  What the article failed to mentjon was that the Presidential Records Act wasn't passed until 1978, ten years after this crime.  However, the espionage act (passed in 1917) did exist in 1968.

In Trumps case, Smith used the PRA to raid Mar-A-Lago, yet prosecuted under the espionage act.  Confusing, but still illegal according to Jack Smith but crickets... [/quote]

Well, but evidence of a political candidate undermining peace talks wouldn't exactly be the same as military defense/offensive plans? Not sure exactly how the evidence of what Nixon was doing would fall under 793 although I suppose the right kind of prosecutor could work out that argument. What's also interesting is that the papers were produce by an administration belong to a party OPPOSING the crook's party. Hard to see any self-serving going on there.

That earlier summary mentioned that they expected Nixon to win. It was a very close election, it would have been more a concern about IF Nixon won.

Brought back an odd memory. I was in confirmation classes back then and one day somehow a guy in the class and I started arguing candidates via notes. I did these doodles like "NIX on NIXON" and "HUMP h REY=King of the Hill"--lame, but I was 14. Pastor caught us and first we were in trouble about the notes and then the pastor went on a long tirade about politics and Vietnam and everything, may have brought up godless communism, not sure on that. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics