Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] - that the conversation was on signal in the first place, which at best wasn’t approved for classified info and most likely was deliberately chosen as a communications platform to avoid accountability, and - [/quote] [b]The government doesn't have anything better.[/b] They have special hardware and live conversation, but nothing better for people who are all over the place with different devices.[/quote] Bullshit. I worked under SecDef Hagel. That's why agency heads designate POC (points of contact) to act on their behalf. Those designated POC should have been the ones in a SCIF discussing and receiving the plans, not the agency heads on an unsecured public app like Signal. Waltz even said when he started the Signal group: "Pls provide the best staff POC from your team for us to coordinate with over the next couple days and over the weekend. Thx." Marco Rubio designated Mike Needham Vance designated Andy Baker Tulsi Gabbard designated Joe Kent Scott Bessent designated Dan Katz Hegseth designated Dan Caldwell John Ratcliffe designated a goddamn active CIA officer by name It is true that the US government does not have its own secure messaging system. But that's why you designate your POCs to act on your behalf when you are on travel. That information should then be disseminated back to the department head through proper secure channels using proper classification. Now they Republicans are talking about how they are going to make sure proper protocols are in place blah, blah, blah. WE ALREADY BLEEPING HAVE THEM! You can create all the goddamn new protocols you want, but if those in charge aren't keen on following protocols, then what's the point? And that's the whole vibe of this admin: do whatever the F they want and damn the consequences. No one can stop them. No one can check them. They know this and that's exactly how they act. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics