Reply to Josh Duggar arrested and in federal custody

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Josh Duggar arrested and in federal custody"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP who saw a few of the graphic posts before they were removed. “Little kids and torture, not just teens showing their breasts” gives an inkling of the horror without being truly graphic. I don’t need to know all the horrific details to know there’s evil in the world. [/quote]

FYI every post I made with the word torture in it got deleted. And I didn’t even describe the alleged video.[b] I just said it wasn’t porn[/b] it was torture and should be described as such to the public so that people don’t brush these crimes off as teens showing their breasts, to take your example. [/quote]
Whoever on here who keeps saying what Duggar downloaded and possessed wasn't CP -- if you're right, then he shouldn't have been charged with those crimes and won't be convicted of the crimes he was charged with, so I don't know why you keep phrasing it that way. [/quote]

I feel like you’re baiting people into arguing this point with you, or discuss how something can be one but also the other, so that you can flag the post yet again or get the whole thread deleted. If you really want to stop this line of discussion you should stop engaging. [/quote]
No, I'm annoyed at the person who keeps saying it "isn't CP." It's poor phrasing. [/quote]

But if it’s then described as ...... (fill in the blank to describe something that isn’t in essence “porn” with images or videos of sexually explicit material, but happens to feature individuals without clothes on who are underage hence the “CP” designation).... you see the issue?

The point is to discuss why things of this nature are , in a sense, “brushed off” as being a type of pornography,  which makes fundamentalists treat it the same as they treat masturbating or looking at playboy. I argue that lumping it into that category- even if that category includes illegal and exploitative things- is problematic. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics