Reply to How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^  PP is correct.  I'm a right leaning independent and I think that the nomination should have waited until after the election.  However, Senate Dems asking her questions they know she shouldn't answer and criticizing her when she doesn't because they don't like that she was nominated at all is distasteful.[/quote]

I found it really distasteful that she was unaware that the constitution sets the date for voting for elections. But considering Thom Tillis said Election Day was November 11, and nobody corrected him, maybe the COVID was frying everyone’s brains...[/quote]

Really?  That's your big takeaway from this?  Here's something that will blow your mind.  The law is written in books so that we don't have to memorize it and can consult it when we have to analyze a particular issue.

- DCUM lawyer[/quote]

+1
And it’s pretty remarkable that she didn’t have to consult *any* books or notes - for three days straight.  [/quote]

Go back and look at Elena Kagan's confirmation hearings.  No notes either.  Did Gorsuch consult a bunch of notes?  Kavanaugh?  This is no big deal, so the ACB supporters need to shut it on this.[/quote]

So funny.  Are you by chance one of the posters who mocked Kayleigh McEnany for using a binder in her pressers - even though it was shown that *every* press secretary before her also used binders?  Asking for a friend.[/quote]

No.

Your response is bizarre.  You realize that many, many different people post here anonymously, don't you?

My post about the notes stands.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics