Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]So then the pool should be the first choice, but if the neighbors insist, DC should surely seek federal permission for the shelter, assuming this poster is correct. Hard to see why such permission would be "unlikely to happen," except that some neighbors don't want to do their part. [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That's why if the Hearst neighbors are dead set against a pool, they should welcome the homeless shelter. It's DC owned land, just like the police parking lot. Actually, Hearst Park is Federal land that the District is allowed to use for 'recreational' purposes. To use it in any other way would mean going back to the Feds and seeking approval. That is unlikely to happen. The Idaho Ave Police site, however, is District land, and they can use it as they see fit. So, DC could opt to co-locate police, homeless and pool complex at Idaho Ave. Police and homeless, however, can't be located at Hearst Park. [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
