Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just to be clear, it appears Blake is adding additional defendants, not plaintiffs.[/quote]

Oof I believe Justin’s side but that doesn’t sound good for him. [/quote]

Can you expand on why? Do you think this is Jed Wallace? I've been waiting for the other shoe to drop on that. The retaliation claims are much stronger than her harassment claims and the Jed Wallace issue is a major problem for Baldoni and the PR folks. But especially Baldoni because it's very hard to argue against retaliation if it turns out he hired Jed, just because of what Jed does. He can argue the PR folks were there to protect his rep, not to take down Lively. But Wallace is a hired gun who destroys reps online (like Heard's).[/quote]

She wasn’t retaliated against. She does not have strong retaliation claims.[/quote]

Dp is that because you think what Justin and team did doesn’t constitute retaliation, or do you think Jed didn’t do anything period because the Blake backlash was self-inflicted? Would love to hear your thoughts on why she doesn’t have strong retaliation claims because there’s one poster here who insists those claims are extremely strong [/quote]

She insists in the absence of evidence, it’s her thing 😊.

Because I’m on LSA and a long-term reader of sites like Datalounge and Dlisted, not Reddit, I was completely familiar with how Blake Lively has been viewed. She’s deeply unpopular and has been for a very long time. I think Wallace did not have to campaign and did not do so, and that Lively’s attorneys and the NYT excerpted to strip content from the texts of Abel. The chart team Lievely threw together wasn’t the only theoretically relevant one — a chart showing consistent positive mentions over prior years contrasted with only negative mentions for this press period. She’s had a toilet-swirling rep for forever. I reference other sites because they have far larger readership than this part of DCUM, and because part of her deep unpopularity is explicitly predicated on racial insensitivity. She has been despised for well over a decade for not giving a sht about celebrating plantations. She doubled down. It is what it is, which is to say, a definitional self-own.[/quote]

Part of it is the racial crap, but she and honestly Ryan too are just so deeply unlikable on a visceral level. They are so smug and phony. She especially is devoid of acting talent and a transparent mean girl. You can’t browbeat the public to admire someone. They are two obnoxious money grabbers who’ve been shoved down our throats for 20 years. See also Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics