Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They were no fake or fraudulent electors in Hawaii. The court ordered recount was still ongoing on the date for electors to meet, so both sets of electors met, knowing that the recount would determine which would be accepted by Congress. No fraud. No outlaw electors. Everything was done under the supervision of the court, for the purpose of ensuring that the winner of the election in Hawaii received the electoral votes from Hawaii.

So the opposite of what Trump and Eastman and Chesebro tried to do, which was to commit fraud to give the Georgia electoral votes to the loser. [/quote]

Edit to add that the Judge in Hawaii ordered that the Democratic slate be named the valid presidential electors for state on Dec. 30 and the Republican Governor certified the Democratic electors on Jan. 4, 1961, so they were not fraudulent self-certified electors they were the official electors certified by the state government. [/quote]

Fascinating. Thanks for the history! And day and night from what took place on Jan 6 and in GA. Anyone who pulls this up as a precedent is going to get burned even worse. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics