Reply to Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What is a fetish website? Why aren’t these monitored for postings about children?[/quote]

That’s exactly how she got caught…[/quote]

But it was a sting operation. A kind of entrapment. Not monitoring actual details between two people without fake police involvement.[/quote]

I don’t know what you’re talking about. They go to the sites where people like her go and find them on the message boards. What more do you want? [/quote]

I think they should focus on the cases they have where people report and stop the sting operations. Now there are two children and a husband hurt by this plus her for a fake person and what exactly did she do? She was going to watch? It wasn’t even like she proposed the act. The police did. I mean it’s creepy but I don’t really understand the crime exactly. There are thousands of actual sex abuse cases that don’t get the attention they deserve. Where people call up and the police don’t have time for them or the judge rules that it was a lesser crime or no crime. Why are they making up cases rather than doubling down on the reported ones?[/quote]

She absolutely did independently propose crimes. She also brought items to use in the criminal conduct she proposed. AND she possessed and shared sex abuse images.[/quote]

+1 where did those images come from? She is already a criminal for having possession of them, or even worse, made those images. People are sick for defending her and condemning the sting when it could have saved other children from similar abuse. [/quote]

I was simply saying that sting operations of all kinds don't deter crime. I don't know this particular crime and person. I just think they need to curtain their sting operations. If 85% of the people found don't have a record or are even found to be anything but low level danger to society even after arrest and conviction plus you are stinging at an 8:1 ratio of sting to actual crime, you have a bigger problem with the sting and its impact on society than the crime. [/quote]

OK, well in the specific case you are wildly off-base. In this specific case, she was not simply lured into engaging in inappropriate behavior by a sting operation. She describes grooming techniques in detail, commiserates about the difficulty of finding new sex abuse videos/content, etc. This isn’t the weird lonely guy in the basement being shown attention by someone pretending to be a young girl.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics