Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry, still think it’s creepy for an anonymous dcum user to be personally attacking the lawyers in this case.  The others are celebrities and the scrutiny comes with the job.  Further, 90 percent of what you are complaining about, if not more, has nothing to do with the posters here.[/quote]

Freedman talks to the press constantly and goes on TMZ every chance he gets.

I looked up the lawyer because I thought it was weird and unprofessional that he'd clearly just googled some AI legal gobbeldy-gook to respond to a discovery dispute with opposing counsel and I was like "where they heck did this guy go to school." We talk a lot in this thread about the quality of lawyering in this case. Well, he's a lawyer on this case. Also he's not that private -- his wedding was in Town & Country magazine. [/quote]

You not only looked him up, you posted about him and tried to connect him to Harvey Weinstein. Creepy and weird.[/quote]

I thought people would be interested, because I was interested. And I didn't "try" to connect him to Weinstein. I discovered the connection and shared it. It's just true. Look up Ken Sunshine on wikipedia. He used to rep Harvey. It is what it is.[/quote]

Others think it’s creepy, just so you know.  And weird.[/quote]

As creepy and weird as showing someone your wife's nude birth video at work with no warning. [/quote]

She was told ahead of time. [/quote]

Do you think if you say it enough, it will be true? She was not told ahead of time. Here is the description of the incident from Baldoni's own timeline AGAIN:

[i]During lunch, as part of a continued creative discussion that Baldoni and Lively were having about the hospital birthing scene, Baldoni asked Heath to show Lively his wife’s post-home-birth video, stating to Heath that Lively had not seen one and was presumably interested in watching. Baldoni himself had seen the video prior and felt it was demonstrative of the spirit of his vision for the birthing scene. [b]Heath agreed to share this deeply personal video and approached Lively with the video in hand. He proceeded to show her one second of it before Lively asked if Heath had permission to share the video[/b], to which Heath confirmed that he did. Lively stated she would like to see the video but asked to watch it after finishing her lunch. Heath did not press the matter and moved on. (NOTE: Lively never did see the video beyond the one-second clip shown to her).[/I]

He did not tell her what it was and started the video with no warning.[/quote]

[b]"stating to Heath that Lively had not seen one and was presumably interested in watching."[/b][/quote]

Where in that sentence do you see the part where Heath or Baldoni told Livley that they wanted to show her Heath's wife's birth video? I'm looking and looking and I can't find it.

In fact the word "presumably" makes it clear they had no idea if she actually wanted to see it, they just assumed she would because.... they are weird, creepy men who think everyone wants to see Heath's wife's birth video.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics