Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So option D?  Positives and negatives?[/quote]

It also sucks for broader Garrett Park community.  Garrett Park pool crew (Garrett Park, Garrett Park estates, white flint park) will not be happy. [/quote]

No worries, they will fix that with the upcoming elementary boundary study[/quote]

They are fine at elementary and middle school actually. It's the high school they are not fine with. That community will rally. I have friends there who are up in arms[/quote]

Wow. That's pretty disgusting. I hope for their children's sakes they do Option D because being this fragile is not good for them.[/quote]

DP
Karen enters the room with disgust. Option D sucks for other reasons. Nobody wants to turn a good school to another crappy DCC ghetto school[/quote]

Let's be real, you all know a 30% FARMS rate is fine, but you also know it means it will reduce the real estate differential for your neighborhood compared with the 40-50% FARMS school and you can't tolerate losing 5% of your $5 million in wealth[/quote]

30% is worse than my current situation and my current situation is barely acceptable. So no, I'm not ok with it. Sure it sucks to lose home equity, but having a cruddy school on top of it? No thanks[/quote]

Has it occurred to you that the low income kids are not the problem?[/quote]

It's their parents who raise wild animals. [/quote]
Sounds like the problem is you[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics