Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just to be clear, it appears Blake is adding additional defendants, not plaintiffs.[/quote]

Oof I believe Justin’s side but that doesn’t sound good for him. [/quote]

Can you expand on why? Do you think this is Jed Wallace? I've been waiting for the other shoe to drop on that. The retaliation claims are much stronger than her harassment claims and the Jed Wallace issue is a major problem for Baldoni and the PR folks. But especially Baldoni because it's very hard to argue against retaliation if it turns out he hired Jed, just because of what Jed does. He can argue the PR folks were there to protect his rep, not to take down Lively. But Wallace is a hired gun who destroys reps online (like Heard's).[/quote]

She wasn’t retaliated against. She does not have strong retaliation claims.[/quote]

Dp is that because you think what Justin and team did doesn’t constitute retaliation, or do you think Jed didn’t do anything period because the Blake backlash was self-inflicted? Would love to hear your thoughts on why she doesn’t have strong retaliation claims because there’s one poster here who insists those claims are extremely strong [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics