Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just want to say I comment the person here who has the strength to respond to the pro-Lively poster's eight-paragraph posts. I used to argue with them in good faith at the beginning of this thread until I realized they will handwave and twist everything. Every. Thing.[/quote] And this is precisely why this thread is hundreds of pages long. Not only does she reply, but it’s always at least 4 or 5 paragraphs, always stating that “she sees all the facts differently.” It’s like everyone seeing the same color green, but she doesn’t see green. She sees powder blue unicorns.[/quote] Different people have different opinions about the case, guys. For the hundredth time, there are 15 comments per page, whether your comment is 5 paragraphs or five characters. So you responding with a paragraph and then responding again with “oopsie I meant me not them” actually makes the thread roll faster than one 7 paragraph comment. Props from me to the PP that pro-Baldoni fans are belittling. They continue to bully and demean her, and she basically just stands her ground and makes her points, and mostly doesn’t even throw insults back at them despite extreme provocation on their part. They are behaving like hoodlums and she is just making her points. It’s like one of those after school specials when a kid gets bullied over and over. 🙌 [/quote] Firstly, no one is bullying her. She is tone deaf, at every turn. And many of us have grown annoyed and intolerant of her contrived pro-Lively no matter what, contortions and distortions. She is becoming (or has become) the very thing that people have found intolerable about the very person she is defending —insufferable in the face of logic and facts. No one is asking for her responses to become compliant in tone. But the way she contorts every…single…word that is said about Blake and/or Ryan underscores her quest for the truth and shows how biased she really is. It’s a ‘Blake at all costs’ attitude that draws everyone’s ire. [/quote] I certainly don’t think she’s tone deaf. I largely agree with her. Each of us does not (at least for now) see the case the way the opposite side does, we read the existing facts in different ways. So stop being so surprised that not everyone on the thread sees things precisely the way you do. If you stop writing multiple insult posts calling them “pathological” or “insufferable” etc for having a different take, you will stop getting called bullies. Looks like the parties have finally agreed on and filed a joint stipulation on ESI, meaning that the parties have now agreed on the basic rules of doc production and one or more party may actually begin producing docs now. I wouldn’t be surprised if Lively etc starts producing to back up their statements that they have been ready to produce for some time (but could not given that the ESI Stip was not filed). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics