Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]its sad that Mr Usys isnt getting the hint that people don't want him around [/quote] I think you got that backwards my friend. ;) When I’m proven right which I will be just remember this scene from Batman. "I never said thank you," to which Batman replies from the rooftop edge, "And you'll never have to". [/quote] So age guy is Mr USYS Now we know why he's pushing for 36 month older players to play down. Playing down is the only way C team players can compete against correct age/grade players. Word of advice. Instead of trying to cut corners maybe USYS should focus on making clubs and teams better.[/quote]it's funny how people were having a conversation without grade and you had to non sequitur in your grade goal. grade never part of nwe sy.[/quote] You mean your conversation with yourself? Sorry grade exists and when its applied to your 36 month older player playing down nonsese people quickly see why it doesnt make sense.[/quote]find a post where somebody wants more than 12 month age group other than you. you've failed this challenge over and over. makes u a hypocrite.[/quote] Age guy / mr usys has been trying to start a rumor that leagues will start doing GY showcases for almost a year. High schools allow students to be held back two times. This means 36 month older players (2 years older ie held back twice) in GY.[/quote] Reporting inside info is different than starting a rumor. Here is a copy and paste from a notice sent out by US Club. Well it’s a document a friend sent me but read the bottom pretty interesting…. 2026/2027 Age Grouping Rationale • Transitioning to an 8/1-7/31 age grouping is a return to the former grouping prior to 2017. Calendar birth year was mandated by US Soccer when most youth soccer was previously using school age. The mandate has been removed, allowing US Club Soccer member organizations the ability to group players as they see fit. The majority of youth soccer is non-competitive/recreational. The benefits of youth sport participation are numerous, but USYS/US Club team members feel that the social elements are some of the most important. • While using the calendar birth year age grouping we heard frequently from families asking for their children to play with their classmates. Using the school year grouping creates the fewest trapped players. US feels that school year grouping promotes stronger team chemistry and retention by allowing children to play with their schoolmates and closest friends. Grouping by school year often places players in a more consistent emotional and physical developmental environment. School age grouping will help college recruitment as it allows for players of the same graduating class participating together in high-level tournament cups and college showcase matches.[/quote] All they're talking about is SY. In SY 11 months of players will all be the same graduating class (grade in school) and August birthdays will play up to be on the correct grade in school team. The end result is. "School age grouping will help college recruitment as it allows for players of the same graduating class participating together in high-level tournament cups and college showcase matches" Nothing about GY showcases. Its all in your head.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics